Welcome all to the first ever Brilliant Inequality Contest. Like the Brilliant Integration Contest, the aim of the Inequality Contest is to improve skills and techniques often used in Olympiad-style Inequality problems. But above all, the main reason is so we can have fun.
Anyone is allowed to participate, as long as they adhere to the following rules.
I will post the first problem. If someone solves it, he or she can post a solution and then must post a new problem.
A solution must be posted below the thread of the problem. Then, the solver must post a new problem as a separate thread.
Please make a substantial comment. Spam or unrelated comments will be deleted. (To help me out, try to delete your comments within an hour of when you posted them, if they are not the solutions.)
Make sure you know how to solve your own problem before posting it, in case no one else is able to solve it within 48 hours. Then, you must post the solution and you have the right to post a new problem.
If the one who solves the last problem does not post a new problem in 24 hours, the creator of the previous problem has the right to post another problem.
The scope of the problems is Olympiad-style inequalities.
You are not allowed to post problems requiring calculus in the solutions (use of differentiation to prove a curve is concave or convex is allowed).
Lagrange Multipliers are not allowed to be used in a solution.
Inequalities allowed to be used are AM-GM, Muirhead, Power Mean and Weighted Power Mean, Cauchy-Schwarz, Holder, Rearrangement, Chebyshev, Schur, Jensen, Karamata, Reverse Rearrangement and Titu's lemma.
Try to post the simplest solution possible. For example, if someone posted a solution using Holder, Titu's and Cauchy, when there is a solution using only AM-GM, the latter is preferred.
Format your proof as follows:
SOLUTION OF PROBLEM (insert problem number here)
[Post your solution here]
PROBLEM (insert problem number here)
[Post your problem here]
Remember to reshare this note so it goes to everyone out there. And above all else, have fun!!!
PROBLEM 1
Let , and be positive reals such that , and . Find families of solutions for such that the following inequality is satisfied.
P.S.: For those who want to discuss problem solutions, they can do so here.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Solution of Problem 1 :
We will show that the given inequality is true for all positive reals x,y,z satisfying the conditions given in the question.
Case 1: When x,y,z are sides of triangle.
Let x=a+b,y=b+c,z=a+c; (a,b,c>0),so our inequality becomes:
cyc∑2(a+b)2(a+b+2c)≥cyc∑(a+b)3+9(a+b)(b+c)(a+c)
⟹2cyc∑(a+b)3+4cyc∑c(a+b)2≥cyc∑(a+b)3+9(a+b)(b+c)(a+c)
⟹cyc∑(a+b)3+4cyc∑c(a+b)2≥9(a+b)(b+c)(a+c)
⟹2cyc∑a3+3cyc∑(ab2+ba2)+4cyc∑(ab2+ba2)+24abc≥9(a+b)(b+c)(a+c)
⟹2cyc∑a3+7(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)+10abc≥9(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)
⟹2cyc∑a3+10abc≥2(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)
⟹cyc∑a3+5abc≥(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)
⟹cyc∑a3+3abc≥a2b+b2a+a2c+c2a+b2c+c2b
which is true by Schur's Inequality.
Equality occurs when a=b=c , that is x=y=z.
Hence proved.
Case 2: When x,y,z are not sides of a triangle.
In this case either x+y=z or y+z=x or z+x=y.
Let's take x+y=z.
Since the inequality is symmetric, WLOG we can assume that z≥x≥y.
Now substituting x+y=z in the inequality , we get 2x2(2y+x)+2y2(2x+y)+2(x+y)3≥x3+y3+(x+y)3+9xyz
After rearranging the expression, we get,x3+y3≥x2y+y2x
which is true by Rearrangement Inequality
Hence proved.
Log in to reply
Can you write the equality cases for Case 2?
Log in to reply
I don't think equality exists . . .
Problem 8
For positive reals a,b,c, prove that (a+b1+b+c1)(b+c1+c+a1)(c+a1+a+b1)≤abc1
Log in to reply
Solution to Problem 8
I used a massive expansion, but I've triple-checked so its right (If you haven't figured it out, expansion is what I do with inequalities). We have to prove
(a+b1+b+c1)(b+c1+c+a1)(c+a1+a+b1)≤abc1
((a+b)(b+c)a+2b+c)((b+c)(c+a)b+2c+a)((c+a)(a+b)c+2a+b)≤abc1
Simplifying the denominators, we have
abc(a+2b+c)(b+2c+a)(c+2a+b)≤(a+b)2(b+c)2(c+a)2
Simplifying all the brackets, we get
2a4bc+2ab4c+2abc4+7a3b2c+7a3bc2+7a2b3c+7ab3c2+7a2bc3+7ab2c3+16a2b2c2≤2a4bc+2ab4c+2abc4+6a3b2c+6a3bc2+6a2b3c+6ab3c2+6a2bc3+6ab2c3+10a2b2c2+a4b2+a4c2+b4a2+b4c2+c4a2+c4b2+2a3b3+2b3c3+2c3a3
Simplifying, we get
a3b2c+a3bc2+a2b3c+ab3c2+a2bc3+ab2c3+6a2b2c2≤a4b2+a4c2+b4a2+b4c2+c4a2+c4b2+2a3b3+2b3c3+2c3a3
By AM - GM, we have
2a4c2+a2b4≥a3b2c,2a4b2+a2c4≥a3bc2,2b4c2+b2a4≥a2b3c
2b4a2+b2c4≥ab3c2,2c4b2+c2a4≥a2bc3,2c4a2+c2b4≥ab2c3
a3b3+b3c3+c3a3≥3a2b2c2⇒2a3b3+2b3c3+2c3a3≥6a2b2c2
Summing these, we get the expansion above. Thus, the statement is true.
Log in to reply
Consider this:
We just need to prove (a+bb+b+cb)(b+cc+c+ac)(c+aa+a+ba)≤1 However by AM-GM LHS≤⎝⎛a+bb+b+cb+b+cc+c+ac+c+aa+a+ba3⎠⎞3=1 A beautiful solution, not by me :P
Problem 3
Prove the following inequality if a,b,c are positive reals and a+b+c+abc=4 ,
(1+ba+ac)(1+cb+ba)(1+ac+cb)≥27
Pakistan Round 1-2016
Problem 6 :
Let x>y>z be positive reals greater than one.
Prove that cyc∑x37>cyc∑x2y31
Log in to reply
Solution 6: Thank You @Harsh Shrivastava,
Since we are given x,y,z∈R+ and x>y>z.
We have two sets x2>y2>z2 and x31>y31>z31.
By rearrangement inequality we have
x2x31+y2y31+z3z31>x2y31+y2z31+z2x31∴cyclic ∑x37> cyclic ∑x2y31
Now my time to post questions!! Harsh By the way how did you thought of this?
Problem 13
Given that a,b,c are non-negative reals satisfying a+b+c=1, prove that (1−a)(1−b)(1−c)≤277+abc
Log in to reply
Solution to Problem 13
I expanded (once more) to get a solution.
Replace (1−a),(1−b),(1−c) with (b+c),(c+a),(a+b) in the in equation to get:
(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)≤277+abc
Expanding and simplifying, we get
a2b+a2c+b2a+b2c+c2a+c2b+abc≤277
Removing the denominator, we get
27a2b+27a2c+27b2a+27b2c+27c2a+27c2b+27abc≤7
Homogenising the RHS, we get
27a2b+27a2c+27b2a+27b2c+27c2a+27c2b+27abc≤7(a+b+c)3
27a2b+27a2c+27b2a+27b2c+27c2a+27c2b+27abc≤7a3+7b3+7c3+21a2b+21a2c+21b2a+21b2c+21c2a+21c2b+42abc
6a2b+6a2c+6b2a+6b2c+6c2a+6c2b≤7a3+7b3+7c3+15abc
a2(b+c)+b2(a+c)+c2(a+b)≤67a3+67b3+67c3+25abc
Note that by Schur's, a2(b+c)+b2(a+c)+c2(a+b)≤a3+b3+c3+3abc. We will prove the sharper inequality:
a3+b3+c3+3abc≤67a3+67b3+67c3+25abc
6a3+6b3+6c3+18abc≤7a3+7b3+7c3+15abc
3abc≤a3+b3+c3
Which is obviously true by AM-GM. Thus, proven.
Log in to reply
Note that this problem is actually equivalent to IMO 1984 #1.
Extension: can you find the best constants for the RHS?
Problem 5
Let x, y, z be positive reals such that xyz=1. Show that
(x+1)2+y2+12+(y+1)2+z2+12+(z+1)2+x2+12≤1
Log in to reply
Solution 5 :
(x−y)2≥0
⟹x2+y2≥2xy
Adding 2x+2 on both sides, x2+y2+2x+2≥2xy+2x+2
⟹xy+x+11≥x2+y2+2x+22
⟹xy+x+11≥(x+1)2+y2+12
Similarly , yz+y+11≥(y+1)2+z2+12 and zx+z+11≥(z+1)2+x2+12
Adding the three inequalities, we get (x+1)2+y2+12+(y+1)2+z2+12+(z+1)2+x2+12≤yz+y+11+xy+x+11+xz+z+11
Since yz+y+11+xy+x+11+xz+z+11=1, the result is evident.
Problem 14
Show that for non-negative real x, y and z,
2x3(x3+8y3)+2y3(y3+8z3)+2z3(z3+8x3)≥9x4(y2+z2)+9y4(z2+x2)+9z4(x2+y2)
Log in to reply
SOLUTION OF PROBLEM 14 LHS−RHS=cyc∑(x−y)4(x2+4xy+y2)≥0 Hence proved
Log in to reply
@Chris Galanis Can you please tell how you came up with that factorization?
Log in to reply
LHS−RHS≥0. Since x,y,z are non negative I expect all the negative terms to form a square. In particular I tried to find pattern like a2−2ab+b2 (which is (a−b)2) or a4−4a3b+6a2b2−4ab3+b4 (which is (a−b)4). Just that
Actually when I solve inequalities this way I expectLog in to reply
Problem 25
For the positive real numbers a,b,c prove that: b(a+b)1+c(b+c)1+a(c+a)1≥2(a+b+c)227
Log in to reply
Solution to Problem 25
This solution is quite long and extremely bashy. Sorry. :P
We have to prove
cyc∑b(a+b)1≥2(a+b+c)227
Multiplying out the denominators and simplifying (here is the bash, but I have suppressed it), we get
cyc∑2a5b+6a4b2+2a2b4+6a3b3+8a4bc≥cyc∑7a3b2c+9a3bc2+8a2b2c2
By AM-GM, we have
7a5b+a4b2+c4a2+a2b4+a2b4+a3b3+a3c3≥7a21b14c7
9a5b+a4b2+c4a2+c4a2+c4a2+a3b3+a3b3+a3c3+a3c3≥9a27b9c18
38a4bc+8ab4c+8abc4≥324a6b6c6
These inequations imply
a5b+a4b2+c4a2+2a2b4+a3b3+a3c3≥7a3b2c
a5b+a4b2+3c4a2+2a3b3+2a3c3≥9a3bc2
8a4bc+8ab4c+8abc4≥24a2b2c2
Adding the first two equations cyclicly, then adding the third equation, we get the statement we wished to prove. Thus proven!
PS: It took me hours to get the right grouping of terms for the AM-GM.
Log in to reply
You could have grouped them by triples of powers that majorize each other, and then applied AM-GM... Saves you all the time of finding your own grouping ;)
PROBLEM 2 :
Let a,b and c be non-negative reals such that a+b+c=1.
Show that 1+6abc≥41+3(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)
Log in to reply
Homogenizing and expanding gives a3+b3+c3+6abc≥a2b+ab2+b2c+bc2+c2a+ca2 which is just Schur.
Solution Problem 2:
1+6abc≥41+3(1−a)(1−b)(1−c)
1+6abc≥41+3(1−(a+b+c)+∑cycab−abc)
1+6abc≥41+3(∑cycab−abc)
43+9abc≥3×∑cycab
41+3abc−∑cycab≥0
1+12abc≥4∑cycab
(a+b+c)3+12abc≥∑cycab
a3+b3+c3+6abc≥∑syma2b
This is schurs inequality.
Log in to reply
How did you use ab+bc+ca≤31 on 1+12abc≥4(ab+bc+ca) to get abc≥0?
Some of you might have seen this but still answer me.
Problem 7
Let a,b,c be positive real numbers such that a1+b1+c1=a+b+c. Prove that
(2a+b+c)21+(2b+c+a)21+(2c+a+b)21≤163
Log in to reply
Solution to Problem 7
By AM-GM (2a+b+c)21≤4(a+b)(a+c)1 and thus it remains to prove cyc∑(a+b)(a+c)1≤43 Clearing denominators, it remains to prove 8(a+b+c)≤3(a+b)(b+c)(c+a) and after homogenizing this becomes 8abc(a+b+c)2≤3(ab+bc+ca)(a+b)(b+c)(c+a) which after expansion and simplification is 3sym∑a3b2≥sym∑a3bc+2sym∑a2b2c which is true by Muirhead.
Problem 10
Given that a2,a3,…,an is a permutation of {2,3,…,n}, prove that (2a2−1)(3a3−1)⋯(nan−1)≥2(n−1)!(n+1)!
Log in to reply
Solution 10 :
Observe that2(n−1)!(n+1)!=(n2−1)((n−1)2−1)⋯(32−1)(22−1)
So now the inequality becomes (2a2−1)(3a3−1)⋯(nan−1)≥(n2−1)((n−1)2−1)⋯(32−1)(22−1)
This can be proven by applying Reverse Rearrangement Inequality on the sets X:(a2−1),(a3−1)⋯,(an−1) and Y:(1×a2),(2×a3),(3×a4)⋯,((n−1)×an).
X,Y will be similarly ordered when ak=k.
So applying Reverse Rearrangement Inequality (Random Sum Product > Similar ordered Product), i=2∏n(Xi+Yi)≥i=2∏n(i2−1)
PROBLEM 12
If a,b,c,d are positive reals such that abcd=1, prove that (1+a)(1+a2)1+(1+b)(1+b2)1+(1+c)(1+c2)1+(1+d)(1+d2)1≥1
Problem 15
Let x1,x2,x3,…,xm>1 ,where m∈N+, be positive integers such that xj<xj+1 (1≤j<m).
Prove that i=1∑mxi31<1
Log in to reply
Another interesting solution.
We got xi≥i+1⇔xi31≤(i+1)31<(i+1)21<i(i+1)1=i1−i+11⇔xi31<i1−i+11(∗) Thus taking the sum for i=1 until i=m: i=1∑mxi31<(∗)i=1∑mi1−i+11=1−m+11<1 Since i=1∑mi1−i+11 is a telescoping series. Hence proved
i=1∑mxi31<∫i=1∞x31 dx=21<1
Problem 23
Find the greatest positive real number k, for which is true that (x2+y2)(3x2+y2)xy≤k1 for all positive real numbers x,y.
Log in to reply
@Chris Galanis, @Sualeh Asif, @Daniel Liu, @Sharky Kesa, @Harsh Shrivastava, @Svatejas Shivakumar. Thanks everyone fit making this such a beautiful contest, hope it went on! For season 2 I will be the organiser, comment please for it.
Log in to reply
Sure!
More than welcome :)
Waiting forit to begin...
Problem 11 :
If a,b,c are positive real numbers that satisfy a+b+c=1, prove that a+bc+b+ac+c+ba≤2
Log in to reply
SOLUTION OF PROBLEM 11
(a+b+c)2=a2+b2+c2+2(ab+bc+ca)=1 or ab+bc+ca≤31 Sincea2+b2+c2≥ab+bc+ca
Now, by Cauchy-Schwarz inequality ((a+bc)2+(b+ac)2+(c+ba)2)(1+1+1)≥a+bc+b+ac+c+ba or 3+3(ab+bc+ca)≥a+bc+b+ac+c+ba
Now 3+3(ab+bc+ca)≤2 since ab+bc+ca≤31. Hence a+bc+b+ac+c+ba≤2.
Equality holds when a=b=c=31. Hence proved.
Log in to reply
Can you please elaborate more on how you applied Cauchy-Schwarz here?
Log in to reply
a+bc,b+ac,c+ba and (1,1,1) then, taking square root on both sides.
It's a just applying Cauchy-Schwarz withProblem 16
For positive reals a,b,c, prove a2+8bca+b2+8cab+c2+8abc≥1.
Source: ISL
Log in to reply
Solution to Problem 16
I used Jensen's Inequality to solve this problem.
Apply Jensen's on the convex function
f(x)=x1
and weights a, b, c in the following way.
a+b+ca f(a2+8bc)+b f(b2+8ca)+c f(c2+8ab)≥f(a+b+ca(a2+8bc)+b(b2+8ca)+c(c2+8ab))
This may be rewritten as
a2+8bca+b2+8cab+c2+8abc≥a3+b3+c3+24abc(a+b+c)23.
Thus, it suffices to prove
(a+b+c)3≥a3+b3+c3+24abc
But we can expand this and simplify to get
a2b+a2c+b2a+b2c+c2a+c2b+2abc≥8abc
(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)≥8abc
Which is true by AM-GM. Thus proven.
Problem 22
Here is a very nice problem I came across.
Given that a,b,c are non-negative reals, prove that (a2+2)(b2+2)(c2+2)≥3(a+b+c)2
Log in to reply
Solution of Problem 22
By Cauchy we got: (a2+2)(1+2(b+c)2)≥(a+b+c)2
Then it suffices to prove that (b2+2)(c2+2)≥3(1+2(b+c)2)
By rearranging and simplifying we get: (b2−2bc+c2)+(2b2c2−4bc+1)≥0(b−c)2+2(bc−1)2≥0 Which is true. Equality holds iff a=b=c=1.
Log in to reply
Can you please elaborate on your first step? I don't seem to see the Cauchy. Did you perhaps mean 2(b+c)2 instead of 2b+c?
EDIT: I tried to solve the problem using your idea and it appears that you have only just typoed. Splendid solution!
Log in to reply
Sorry for the delay guys, and the inconvenience caused by me.
Problem 24:
Let a,b,c be positive reals.
Prove that cyc∏(1+ba)≥2(1+(abc)31a+b+c)
Log in to reply
Open up the brackets and simplify a bit to get cyc∑(ba+ca)≥2(abc)31(a+b+c)
Substitute a=x3,b=y3andc=z3, we get cyc∑(y3x3+z3x3)≥2xyz(x3+y3+z3)=cyc∑(yzx2+yzx2)
Now using re-arrangement inequality, we can get our desired result.
I think this is equivalent to (1+ba)(1+cb)(1+ac)≥2(1+(abc)1/3a+b+c)
By applying Holder's Inequality to LHS it suffices to prove that ((1+(bacbac)1/3)3≥2(1+(abc)1/3a+b+c)⇒4≥1+(abc)1/3a+b+c⇒(abc)1/3≥3a+b+c But by AM-GM this is true only for a=b=c=1
Edit: If the problem had the direction of the inequality flipped then we would have to prove that
(1+ba)(1+cb)(1+ac)≤2(1+(abc)1/3a+b+c)≤AM−GM2(1+a+b+c/3a+b+c)=8
Then it suffices to prove that (a+b)(b+c)(c+a)≤8abc≤AM−GM(32(a+b+c))3≤8abc⇒a3+b3+c3+3a2b+3a2c+3ab2+3ac2+3b2c+3bc2≤21abc But again that would be true by rearrangement inequality if the direction of the inequality was flipped...
Log in to reply
The problem is that every time you apply an inequality, the inequality weakens a bit. If you apply inequalities in the incorrect fashion or too much, then the original inequality will weaken to the point that it is false.
@Chris Galanis I hope you post your problem soon!
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
abc=1.
Since the inequality is homogenous, we assumeWe can factor it to cyc∑(a+b)(ab−1)≥0
Next problem please!
Log in to reply
Hmm sorry guyz I won't be able to post solution now because I am a bit busy. Will post a solution by tmmrw evening(my time zone).
Problem 26
Given positive reals x, y, z greater than or equal to 1 such that
x1+y1+z1=2
Prove
x+y+z≥x−1+y−1+z−1
Log in to reply
Another solution:
The problem is equivalent to (x+y+z)(3−x1−y1−z1)≥(x−1+y−1+z−1)2
Confirm that 1−x1≥0⟹x≥1; thus, by C-S we are done.
Problem 27
Given positive reals a,b,c, prove that 3cyc∑ca+b≥10+8⋅ab+bc+caa2+b2+c2
Log in to reply
(1) (a+b)(b+c)(c+a)≥98(a+b+c)(ab+bc+ca) which is true since by expanding and simplifying we get sym∑a2b≥6abc which is rearrangement inequality.
(2) (sym∑a2b)+2abc=(a+b)(b+c)(c+a) and (a+b+c)2=a2+b2+c2+2(ab+bc+ca)
3cyc∑ca+b≥10+8⋅ab+bc+caa2+b2+c2 Adding 6 to both sides and using (2) we get:
3abc(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)≥8ab+bc+ca(a+b+c)2 Thus by (1) it suffices to prove that:
(ab+bc+ca)2≥3abc(a+b+c) Which is true since by expanding and simplifying both sides we get rearrangement inequality. Hence proved!
@Sharky Kesa The contest ended? Wish it could have continued for some for time. Anyway thanks to everyone who participated in this contest, learnt a lot and had a lot of fun.
PROBLEM 4
For positive real numbers a,b,c prove that 2a+ba+2b+cb+2c+ac≤1
Log in to reply
I have a long way of doing this (Long because I expanded).
2a+ba+2b+cb+2c+ac≤1
a(2b+c)(2c+a)+b(2a+b)(2c+a)+c(2a+b)(2b+c)≤(2a+b)(2b+c)(2c+a)
12abc+4a2b+4b2c+4c2a+ab2+bc2+ca2≤9abc+4a2b+4b2c+4c2a+2ab2+2bc2+2ca2
3abc≤ab2+bc2+ca2
The last statement is obviously true by AM-GM. Thus, proven.
Problem 9
Let x, y, z be reals such that xyz=−1. Show that
x(x3+3)+y(y3+3)+z(z3+3)≥yx2+zx2+xy2+zy2+xz2+yz2
Log in to reply
What a strange inequality.
Homogenizing and expanding reduces it to sym∑x4+2sym∑x3y≥3sym∑x2yz which factors as 21sym∑(x2−y2)2+sym∑xy(x−y)2+23sym∑x2(y−z)2≥0 which is true.
Applying Jensen's inequality in LHS we get 3f(x)+f(y)+f(z)≥f(3x+y+z)⇒f(x)+f(y)+f(z)≥3⋅((3x+y+z)4+3⋅(3x+y+z))⇒cyc∑x(x3+3)≥27(x+y+z)4+3(x+y+z) for f(x)=x(x3+3)=x4+3x which is convex as its graph is U-shaped
Now I think what is left to prove is that: 27(x+y+z)4+3(x+y+z)≥yx2+zx2+xy2+zy2+xz2+yz2 But I don't know how to go on. Am I correct this far?
Log in to reply
Yeah I think so
Problem 17
For positive reals x, y and z such that xyz=1, prove that
x3(y+z)1+y3(z+x)1+z3(x+y)1≥23
Log in to reply
This is a very famous inequality that appeared in IMO in the late 90s I believe. My approach goes as follows.
SOLUTION OF PROBLEM 17
Dividing the numerator and denoninator by x2,y2 and z2 respectively and applying Titu's Lemma we get x3(y+z)1+y3(z+x)1+z3(x+y)1≥2(xy+yz+zx)(x1+y1+z1)2=2(xy+yz+zx)(xy+yz+zx)2=2xy+yz+zx
Now, by A.M-G.M inequality 2xy+yz+zx≥3⋅23(xyz)2=23.
Equality holds if and only if x=y=z=1. Hence proved.
PROBLEM 18
For positive real numbers a,b,c with a+b+c=abc, prove that 1+a21+1+b21+1+c21≤23.
Log in to reply
Solution Of Problem 18 :
Substitute a= tanx , b= tany , c= tanz such that x+y+z=π
Since a,b,c are positive reals, x,y,z are all less than 2π
Now we want to prove that cosx+cosy+cosz≤1.5
By Jensen's Inequality,
cos(3x+y+z)≥3cosx+cosy+cosz
⟹cosx+cosy+cosz≤23
Note that f(p)=cosp is concave down down for all 0≤p≤2π.This can be checked by differentiating f(p) twice.
Problem 19 :
Let x,y,z be positive real numbers.Prove that cyc∑x3+y3+xyz1≤xyz1
Log in to reply
Solution to Problem 19
Since this inequality is homogenous, WLOG xyz=1. We will prove that
x3+y3+11≤x+y+zz
(x3+y3)z+z≥x+y+z
Note that x3+y3=(x+y)(x2−xy+y2).
(x+y)(x2−xy+y2)z≥x+y
(x2+y2−xy)z≥1
By AM-GM, x2+y2≥2xy. Substituting, we get
(2xy−xy)z≥1
xyz≥1
Which is obviously true by our assumption. Thus, proven. The inequality in the question can be achieved by adding cyclicly.
We have already proven (with WLOG xyz=1 because of the equation's homogeneity)
x3+y3+11≤x+y+zz
This means that
x3+y3+11+y3+z3+11+z3+x3+11≤x+y+zx+y+z
cyc∑x3+y3+11≤1
Note that since xyz=1, xyz1=1. Thus,
cyc∑x3+y3+xyz1≤xyz1
Problem 20
Let a, b and c be positive reals such that abc=8. Prove that
(1+a3)(1+b3)a2+(1+b3)(1+c3)b2+(1+c3)(1+a3)c2≥34.
Log in to reply
Solution of Problem 20
Note that 1+k3=(1+k)(1−k+k2)≤AM−GM2k2−k+1+k+1=2k2+2⇔k2+22≤(1+k3)1(∗) Hence: cyc∑(1+a3)(1+b3)a2⇒(∗)cyc∑(a2+2)(b2+2)4a2⇒3cyc∑a2(c2+2)⇒cyc∑2a2+cyc∑a2b2≥34≥34≥(a2+2)(b2+2)(c2+2)≥72 Which is true by applying AM-GM in both sums separately. Hence proved.
Problem 28
For the real numbers a,b,c,d prove that: −1≤a2+b2c2+d2ac+bd≤1
Log in to reply
For the right hand side note that for positive real numbers(or all negative) (a2+b2)(c2+d2)≥(ac+bd)2 By C.S .
Now it suffices to consider the case when one of a,b,c,d are negative. If one of them is negative. WLOG assume a then let A=−a. Thus (bd−Ac)2≤(bd+ac)2≤(a2+b2)(c2+d2) equality holds when A=a=0
If any two of them are negative we have two cases .
WLOG assume a,b. Then let A=−a, B=−b, ∴(Ac+Bd)2=(ac+bd)2 Otherwise assume both of a,c are negative.Then there multiple is positive and we are done.
The case when 3 are negative is equivalent to the case when one is negative.
Log in to reply
Yet that is not a proof since a,b,c,d may not be positive
Log in to reply
I tend to keep posting my progress because the mobile app gets stuck
Problem 21
If for the real numbers a,b,c where bc=0 is true that bc1−c2≥0, prove that: 10(a2+b2+c2−bc3)≥2ab+5ac
Log in to reply
If ∣c∣≥1 and sgn(b)=−sgn(c), then the inequality is 10(a2+b2+c2−bc3)≥10(a2+b2+c2)≥2ab+5ac⟺(a−b)2+25(a−c)2+213a2+9b2+215c2≥0 solved.
If ∣c∣≤1 and sgn(b)=sgn(c), then the inequality is 10(a2+b2+c2−bc3)≥10(a2+b2+c2−bc)≥2ab+5ac⟺(a−b)2+25(a−c)2+5(b−c)2+213a2+4b2+25c2≥0 done.
Not a very strong inequality; no equality case in fact.
Can this problem be done without calculus? I have no idea how to proceed with this problem.
Log in to reply
Me and Sharky were discussing about it and it showed this can be nearly solved using x2≥0,x∈R.