Hi Brilliant! This is the sequel of the first part of Brilliant Summation Contest Season-1.
Update: This contest has been ended. Thanks for everyone's participation.
The aims of the Summation contest are to improve skills in the computation of sums, to learn from each other as much as possible, and of course to have fun. Anyone here may participate in this contest.
The rules are as follows:
I will start by posting the first problem. If there is a user solves it, then they must post a new one.
You may only post a solution of the problem below the thread of problem and post your proposed problem in a new thread. Put them separately.
Only make substantial comment that will contribute to the discussion.
Make sure you know how to solve your own problem before posting it in case there is no one can answer it within 48 hours, then you must post the solution and you have a right to post another problem.
If the one who solves the last problem does not post his/her own problem after solving it within a day, then the one who has a right to post a problem is the last solver before him/her.
You are NOT allowed to post a multiple summation problem.
Problems must be purely of summation. They shouldn't have integrals and products in them. Solutions can follow methods that use integrals and products.
It is NOT compulsory to post original problems. But make sure it has not been posted on brilliant.
There is no restriction in the standard of summations.
Please post your solution and your proposed problem in a single new thread.
Format your post is as follows:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
|
The comments will be easiest to follow if you sort by "Newest":
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Problem 27:
Prove:
n=−∞∑∞(−e−π)n2=Γ(43)(2π)41
Log in to reply
We have a proof on brilliant
n=−∞∑∞(e−π)n2=Γ(43)(π)41
Now use this formula ϕ(−e−2π/n)=Γ(43)(π)4121/4r2,2n1/4r2,2/n2
rk,n is a function of DedeKind Eta function. Which have some formulaes to solve.
r2,2=21/8andr2,1/2=2−1/8
Thus , you get Γ(3/4)(2π)1/4
Log in to reply
At least could you elaborate on step 2?
Log in to reply
This is evaluated in ramanujan's notebook which I have but there's no proof for the formula used :/ . So I was trying to prove the above q-product
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Problem 17 :
Prove That
n=0∑∞∏r=0n(4r+1)2n−1n!=42π+2log(1+2)
This problem has been solved by Aditya Kumar.
Log in to reply
Solution to Problem 17:
S=n=0∑∞∏r=0n(4r+1)2n−1n!
S=n=0∑∞[Γ(n+45)2−n−1Γ(n+1)Γ(45)]
Using beta function, we get:
S=n=0∑∞[2−n−1B(n+1,45).(n+45)]
S=21n=0∑∞[2−nB(n+1,45).n]+85n=0∑∞[2−nB(n+1,45)]
S=21∫01{n=0∑∞[2−n.n.tn(1−t)41]dt}+85∫01{n=0∑∞[2−n.tn(1−t)41]dt}
Now I'll use the following geometric progression summations:
A=n=0∑∞[(xt)n(1−t)41]=1−xt(1−t)41,B=n=0∑∞[(xt)n.n.(1−t)41]=(1−xt)2xt(1−t)41
S=45∫012−t(1−t)41dt+∫01(2−x)2x(1−x)41dx
The first integral can be easily evaluated. The second one is also easily evaluated. I was screwed up and I couldn't evaluate it. So I asked for it here.
Hence the final answer on doing some simplification is:
n=0∑∞∏r=0n(4r+1)2n−1n!=42π+2log(1+2)
Problem 18:
Prove that:
k=0∑n(n−kn+k)2k+1(−1)n+k=−2n+12cos(32(n−1)π)?
This Problem has been solved by Ishan Singh.
Log in to reply
Solution Of Problem 18 :
Proof : Since (rn)=0 for r>n, we can rewrite the sum as
Sn=r=0∑∞(−1)r(r2n+1−r)
From the Binomial Theorem, we see that the sum is the coefficient of xn in
f(x)=xn(1−x)2n+1+xn−1(1−x)2n+…
=x2−x+1(1−x)n+1
Note that,
n=0∑∞Ur(a)xr=x2−2ax+11
where Ur(x) is the Chebyshev Polynomial of the second kind.
Putting a=21, we see that,
f(x)=(1−x)n+1n=0∑∞Ur(21)xr(∗)
To calculate the coefficient of xn in (∗), we see that coefficient of xn−r for fixed r in (1−x)n+1 is (−1)n−r(n−rn+1), so coefficient of xn is,
r=0∑n(−1)n−r(n−rn+1)Ur(21)
Substituting r↦r−1, we have,
Sn=r=1∑n+1(−1)n+1−r(n+1−rn+1)Ur−1(21)
=(−1)n+1r=1∑n+1(−1)r(rn+1)Ur−1(21)(∵(n−rn)=(rn))
=(−1)n+1(32)r=1∑n+1(−1)r(rn+1)sin(3rπ)(∵Ur−1(21)=sin(3rπ))
(−1)n+1(32)r=0∑n+1(−1)r(rn+1)sin(3rπ)(∵sin0=0)
Now, r=0∑n+1(−1)r(rn+1)sin(3rπ)=ℑ(r=0∑n+1(−1)r(rn+1)e3irπ)=(−1)n+1sin(32(n+1)π)
⟹Sn=32sin(32(n+1)π)□
Proof : k=0∑n(−1)n+k(2k+1n+1+k)=k=0∑n(−1)n+k(n−kn+1+k)=k=0∑n(−1)k(k2n+1−k)=Sn
(∵(rn)=(n−rn) & r=0∑nf(k)=r=0∑nf(n−k))□
Now,
λ=k=0∑n2k+1(−1)n+k(n−kn+k)
=k=0∑n(2k+1)!(n−k)!(−1)n+k(n+k)!
=2n+11k=0∑n(2k+1)!(n−k)!(−1)n+k(n+k)![(n+k+1)+(n−k)]
=2n+11k=0∑n((−1)n+k(2k+1n+1+k)−(−1)n−1+k(2k+1n+k))
=2n+11(Sn−Sn−1)
Using the Proposition and simplifying, we have,
λ=−2n+12cos(32(n−1)π)□
Problem 22:
Prove the identity:
k=1∑nn−k+1Hk=(Hn+1)2−Hn+1(2)
This problem has been solved by Aditya Sharma, Mark Hennings and Ishan Singh.
Log in to reply
Let S(r)=k=0∑nkHr−k for r>0 with S(0)=0.
We have , S(n+1)=k=1∑nn−k+1Hk=k=1∑nkHn−k+1=k=1∑nkHn−k+n+12Hn=S(n)+n+12Hn
Telescoping above we have , S(n+1)=k=0∑nk+12Hk
Lemma :k=0∑n[(k+1)p−kp]Hk(m)=(n+1)pHn(m)−Hn(m−p)
Proof : Using summation by parts we have ,
k=0∑n[(k+1)p−kp]Hk(m)=(n+1)pHn+1(p)−k=0∑n(k+1)(m−p)=(n+1)pHn+1(p)−Hn+1(m−p)=(n+1)Hn(p)−Hn(m−p) & thus proved.
We'll use a well known Harmonic sum identity , k=1∑nkHk=21((Hn)2+Hn(2))
Applying the lemma for p=−1,m=1 we have,
S(n+1)=2k=0∑nk+1Hk=k=1∑nk2Hk+n+1Hn−Hn(2)
Simplifying we get , k=1∑nn−k+1Hk=(Hn+1)2−Hn+1(2)
Log in to reply
The generating function of the S(n) is n=1∑∞S(n)xn+1=n=1∑∞Hnxn×n=1∑∞n1xn=1−xln2(1−x) so the result follows using the known formulae for the generating functions for Hn(2) and for (Hn)2.
We have,
S=k=1∑nn−k+1Hk
=k=1∑nr=1∑kr(n−k+1)1
=r=1∑nk=r∑nr(n−k+1)1
=r=1∑nk=r∑nr(k−r+1)1
=r=1∑nk=r∑nr(k−r+1)(k+1)(k−r+1+r)
=r=1∑nk=r∑n(k+1)1[(k−r+1)1+r1]
=k=1∑nr=1∑k(k+1)1[(k−r+1)1+r1]
=2k=1∑nk+1Hk
Substitute k+1↦k
⟹S=2k=2∑n+1kHk−1
=2k=2∑n+1kHk−1−k1
=2k=1∑n+1kHk−2Hn+1(2)
Since k=1∑n+1kHk=21(Hn+12+Hn+1(2)) (I have proved it here), we have,
S=(Hn+1)2−Hn+1(2)□
Problem 24:
Prove that k≥1∑k2(k2k)F2kHk−1(2)=37552π4
This problem has been solved by Aditya Kumar.
Log in to reply
Solution of Problem 24:
Proof:
Consider: fn(x)=(2n)!sin2nx.
Then we get: f"n(x)=fn−1(x)−(2n)2fn(x)
We can write x2=n=0∑∞anfn(x) for some function an.
On differentiating both sides twice:
2=n=1∑∞an(fn−1(x)−(2n)2fn(x))=n=0∑∞an+1fn(x)−n=1∑∞an(2n)2fn(x)
From this relation a1=2 and an+1=an(2n)2
Thus, 2an=k=1∏n−1akak+1=22n−2(n−1)!2.
Hence, we get : x2=21n=1∑∞⎣⎢⎢⎡n2(n2n)22nsin2nx⎦⎥⎥⎤
Proof:
From Lemma 1, we can write: x2=21n=1∑∞⎣⎢⎢⎡n2(n2n)22nsin2nx⎦⎥⎥⎤=21n=1∑∞bn2fn(x)
Here, bn=2n(n−1)! and bn+1=2nbn.
We can write: x4=21n=1∑∞anbn2fn(x) for some function an.
On differentiating both sides twice:
12x2=21n=0∑∞an+1bn+12fn(x)−21n=1∑∞anbn2(2n)2fn(x)
Thus, we get: (an+1−an)bn2(2n)2=12bn2
From here we get: (an+1−an)=(2n)212.
Hence, an=Hn−1(2).
Therefore, we get: x4=21n=1∑∞⎣⎢⎢⎡n2(n2n)22nsin2nxHn−1(2)⎦⎥⎥⎤.
From lemma 2, we get: (sin−1x)4=23n=1∑∞n2(n2n)22nHn−1(2)x2n ...(A)
Now, in the problem, we use: F2k=5φ2k−φ2k1
On substituting and using A, we get: k≥1∑k2(k2k)F2kHk−1(2)=37552π4
Log in to reply
(+1) Nicely explained! I solved using Beta Functions and Integration.
Problem 20 :
Evaluate im=1∑nim−1=1∑im⋯i2=1∑i3i1=1∑i21
This problem has been solved by Aditya Sharma and Ameya Daigavane.
Log in to reply
Although @Aditya Sharma has solved the question - I thought of an approach that might be considered more "illuminating" than induction.
Let's think of the i1,i2,...im as numbers on a register - each ik is one number from 1 to n. Initially, the register reads m ones, because all the ik are 1.
For each unique number on the register, we add one to our count.
Now, we turn the first number (im) to 2.
The register reads 2 followed by m−1 1s.
Note that a digit to the right of another digit can never be greater than it, because ij≥ikif j≥k.
So, the number on our register is an m digit number whose digits are non-decreasing when read from left to right.
We can keep turning the register and counting how many unique numbers we get, until we reach m digits with value n. After this, our register stops working.
It is easy to see that every single number satisfying the non-decreasing digit condition is encountered, and only once.
So our question now becomes:
What is the number of tuples i1,i2,...im satisfying,
1≤i1≤i2≤…≤im≤n
Because for each one of these tuples, we have a number on our register.
If we write the numbers in a row, i1i2…im and divide them into n blocks, such that the numbers enclosed in the nth block get value n, then we have found one such possibility. We need n−1 bars to separate the numbers into n blocks.
For example, if m=4,n=4, we can divide the numbers as, i1∣∣i2i3∣i4 Here 0 i1=1,i2=i3=3,i4=4
Clearly, the number of ways we can separate these numbers, is the number of tuples we need, because numbers with higher indices are always given higher (or equal) values.
So, we can finish with stars-and-bars, as we have m numbers, and n−1 separators, so the total number of separations/tuples is: (n−1m+n−1) which is the same answer as above.
Let S=im=1∑nim−1=1∑im⋯i2=1∑i3i1=1∑i21
S=im=1∑nim−1=1∑im⋯i2=1∑i3(1i2)
S=im=1∑nim−1=1∑im⋯i3=1∑i4(2i3+1)
S=im=1∑nim−1=1∑im⋯i4=1∑i5(3i4+2)
It's obvious from induction that S=im=1∑n(m−1im+m−2)=mn(nm+n−1)
Problem 21:
Prove that: n=0∑∞(n2n)5−n=5
This problem has been solved by Aditya Kumar.
Log in to reply
Solution to Problem 21:
We use the well known generating function of Central Binomial coefficient:
1−4x1=n=0∑∞(n!)2(2n)!xn
Here substitute x=51.
Hence, n=0∑∞(n2n)5−n=5
Log in to reply
Proof of that generating function?Thanks.
Log in to reply
here.
There are many ways but I learnt itProblem 29:
Prove:
m=1∑991+cos(100mπ)sin(10017mπ)sin(10039mπ)=1037
Due to time constraint, I have decided to post the solution.
Log in to reply
Define T(k)=m=1∑n−11+cosnmπcosnmkπ
Observing that cos(k+1)θ+2coskθ+cos(k−1)θ=2coskθ(1+cosθ)
The following recurrence relation is obtained:
T(k+1)+2T(k)+T(k−1)=2m=1∑n−1cosnmkπ=1+coskπ+sinkπtan2nkπ
Note that an implicit restriction of k∈/nZ is forced because the GP formula is invalid when the common ratio is ±1.
Evaluate the recurrence relation at k+1 and add together to yield
T(k+2)+3T(k+1)+3T(k)+T(k−1)=2
Evaluate this recurrence relation at k and take the difference to homogenise the recurrence relation:
T(k+2)+2T(k+1)−2T(k−1)−T(k−2)=0
The characteristic roots are 1 and −1 with multiplicity 3.
The general solution to the recurrence relation is thus
(C1k2+C2k+C3)(−1)k+C4
Returning to the original problem, define S(a,b,n)=m=1∑n−11+cosnmπsinnamπsinnbmπ where 0≤b≤a≤n
We find that 2S(a,b,n)=T(a−b)−T(a+b)
Note that (−1)a+b≡(−1)a−b
Substituting T(k) into the above and expanding, we obtain
S(a,b,n)=(2C1a+C2)b(−1)a+b+1=(−1)a+bC1^b(C2^−a)
A short computation yields S(1,1,n)=n−1
From S(n,b,n)=0&S(1,1,n)>0, C2^=n
From S(1,1,n)=n−1, C1^=1
Therefore, we conclude S(a,b,n)=(−1)a+bb(n−a)
Substituting b=17,a=39,n=100, and the result which was to be shown follows.
Log in to reply
Nice solution. I missed the 48 hour time.
This was the best solution!
Problem 23 :
Prove that : n=−∞∑∞(n+a)4(−1)n=6π4sin2(πa)cos(πa)(6csc2(πa)−1) for a∈R and a is not an integer.
This problem has been solved by Aman Rajput.
Log in to reply
n≥−∞∑(n+a)4(−1)n=42(−1)4(k≥0∑(k+1−2a)41+(k+2a)41−(k−21−a)41−(k−21+a)41)
=161(61(ψ(3)(1−2a)+ψ(3)(2a)−ψ(3)(21−a)−ψ(3)(21+a)))
Using reflection formula and On a little bit solving you get
6π4sin2(πa)cos(πa)(6csc2(πa)−1) Sorry for short solution
Log in to reply
Yup its ok. Nice solution .
Alternative :
Consider the function f(z)=(z+a)41 which analytic and has poles at the point z=−a of order 4.
Considering the square contour positively oriented having vertices ±(1+i) and by residue lemma we derive ,
Res(−a)=61z→−alimdz3d3(πcsc(πz))
Finally using alternate summation theorem ,
n=−∞∑∞(n+a)4(−1)n=−61z→−alimdz3d3(πcsc(πz))=6π4sin2(πa)cos(πa)(6csc2(πa)−1)
which gives the result as desired.
Log in to reply
firstly , i thought it can be solved using laurent series... but i thought we dont go to the complex analysis . :) nice
Log in to reply
Problem 25:
Evaluate:
r=1∑nHr2
This problem has been solved by Aman Rajput.
Log in to reply
Using Summation by parts k=1∑nHk2=Hn((n+1)Hn−n)−1≤k≤n−1∑k+1(k+1)Hk−k
=(n+1)Hn2−nHn−nHn−1+n−1+n−Hn
Problem 26: Prove : k≥1∑2k+1Hk(4)−Hk−21(4)=2ζ(2)ζ(3)−(15ln2−14)ζ(4)
This problem has been solved by Aditya Kumar.
Log in to reply
n=1∑∞⎣⎡2n+1Hn(4)−H22n−1(m)⎦⎤=n=1∑∞[2n+116∑k=1∞(2n+2k−1)41−∑k=1∞(n+k)41]
=n=1∑∞k=1∑∞[(2n+1)(n+k)4(2n+2k−1)416(n+k)4−(2n+2k−1)4]
=n=1∑∞k=n+1∑∞[(2n+1)(k)4(2k−1)416(k)4−(2k−1)4]
=n=1∑∞k=n+1∑∞[(2n+1)(k)4(2k−1)432(k)3−24(k)2+8k−1]
=n=1∑∞[k=n∑∞[(2n+1)(k)4(2k−1)432(k)3−24(k)2+8k−1]−(2n+1)(n)4(2n−1)432(n)3−24(n)2+8n−1]
Now, we change the order of the double sum:
=k=1∑∞n=1∑k[(2n+1)(k)4(2k−1)432(k)3−24(k)2+8k−1]−n=1∑∞[(2n+1)(n)4(2n−1)432(n)3−24(n)2+8n−1]
Now using the 3 formulas I have provided above and evaluating each summation (which is basic wrt this contest), on simplification gives:
k≥1∑2k+1Hk(4)−Hk−21(4)=2ζ(2)ζ(3)−(15ln2−14)ζ(4)
The simplification is left as an exercise to the readers.
Log in to reply
justify your last double summation. partial fraction is justified. @Aditya Kumar
Log in to reply
Problem 19 :
Prove That
r=1∑nHr(2)=(n+1)Hn(2)−Hn
Notation : Hn(m)=k=1∑nkm1 denotes the Generalized Harmonic Number.
This problem has been solved by Deeparaj Bhat.
Log in to reply
r=1∑nHr(2)=r=0∑n−1(1+r)2n−r=r=0∑n−1(1+r)2n+1−1+r1=(n+1)Hn(2)−HnQ.E.D.
Problem 30 :
Evaluate:
n=1∑∞(n2n)3n
Log in to reply
0∫1n≥1∑(2n+1)(3x−3x2)ndx
−90∫1(3x2−3x+1)2x4−2x3+2x2−xdx
27−9(−9−43π)
31(9+43π)
Note that,
f(x)=2arcsin(2x)=n=1∑∞n2(n2n)xn
The series is xdxd(xdxdf(x)) at x=3
=3+34π
Problem 28: Prove:
Log in to reply
Starting with n=1∑∞nHnxn=−∫0xu(1−u)ln(1−u)du=Li2(x)+21ln2(1−x) we have f(x)=n=1∑∞n(−1)n+1Hnxn=−Li2(−x)−21ln2(1+x) Then, on reordering a multiple integral, S====n=1∑∞n2(4n+4)(−1)n+1Hn=24n=1∑∞n2(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)(n+4)(−1)n+1Hn24∫01dp∫0pdq∫0qdr∫0rds∫0stf(t)dt∫01t(1−t)4f(t)dt−∫01t(1−t)4{Li2(−t)+21ln2(1+t)}dt These integral are easy -even WA can do them -and the answer is a simple calculation.
Let Jack post the next question.
Log in to reply
This is called solution . Very nice sir ! Jusified clearly
So far I've managed to arrive at a sum of sums by the method of Partial Fractions.
In the hopes it will help anyone, here is the decomposition.
n2(4n+4)1≡n21−12n25+n+14−n+23+3(n+3)4−4(n+4)1
Log in to reply
You can proceed here by using the generating function.
Proceeding from the decomposition of the denominator, we break the sum into six parts.
n2(4n+4)(−1)n+1Hn≡−n2(−1)nHn+1225⋅n(−1)nHn+n+14(−1)n+1Hn+n+23(−1)n+2Hn+34⋅n+3(−1)n+3Hn+4(n+4)(−1)n+4
Note the powers have been adjusted to match the denominator.
By using the Generating Function for the Harmonic Numbers and swapping the order of integration and summation, we obtain lots of logarithms, and a few Dilogarithms and Trilogarithms.
Use the Polylogarithm identities found on here: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Trilogarithm.html and here: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Dilogarithm.html to simplify everything.
Log in to reply
yes. That was one method. Posting all the steps is indeed tedious.
Log in to reply
its better if you paste screenshots of wolframalpha.. that would help here
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
I do not know of a faster way to achieve the result.
Log in to reply
Bonus Problem: Evaluate :
None has solved this question till 5 days
Log in to reply
...knock knock, is this comp over?
Let k=Γ(3/4)π1/4
ϕ(−e−2nπ)=n1/421/4rn,nkr2,2n2
Put n=6 We have r6,6=213/2431/81+3(1+3+233/4)1/3
r2,72=21/4η(12i)η(6i)
solving this function, and putting back into equation we get
@Aman Rajput Sir, could you please suggest me some good books from where I can learn these type of summations from???
Log in to reply
Such kind of things are not in books. Go for research papers developed by great mathematicians from different universities. Sometimes it requires computers mathematical software like mathematica or maple to solve questions.
Log in to reply