Hello there, I'm currently struggling with the following assumption:
If the graphs of the functions \(f\) and \(g\) have a horizontal tangent at the point \(x_0\), the graph of \(f*g\) also has a horizontal tangent at the point \(x_0\).
When I came across this assumption, I visualized it like wave functions interfering. Given the information in the assumption, the waves must be interfering constructively, thus creating a new extremum at , proving the assumption to always be true.
Overlooked the possibility of an inflection point / saddle point. So you have to argue that using the product rule, we obtain for , thus proving the assumption.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
You can consider the graphs f(x)=x2 and g(x)=x3, a horizontal tangent is sure to form but it can be an inflection point too!
Log in to reply
Yes, I did not consider that, thank you. Should have just proved it by using the product rule.