Propositions:
It is well known by the standard Riemann Zeta function that
ζ(s)=n=1∑∞ns1
For R(s)>1.
Also, the Prime Zeta function gives us
P(s)=p∑ps1
For p∈{primes} and R(s)>1.
Conclusion:
This means that the sum of sth powers of the reciprocals of all composite numbers can be given by the formula
P′(s)=p′∑p′s1=n=1∑∞ns1−p∑ps1−1=ζ(s)−P(s)−1
For p′∈{composite numbers} and R(s)>1.
Knowing that infinite sums are risky to handle. I would like your opinions on whether the conclusion drawn from the two given true propositions made above are correct or not.
#Calculus
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
if un,vn are convergent sequences then so is their difference. Provided ζ(s),P(s) converges which is obvious ,your conclusions are true enough