So I have this limit here:
I know that the limit of just sin() (as x tends to 0) does not exist, as it is constantly oscillating between 1 and -1. My question is whether or not the fraction in the limit shown can be cancelled or not, as at some point the fraction can equal , which is not defined. What I really want to know is WHY it can or cannot be cancelled. If it is also possible, I would like to find out the answer to the limit too.
Thanks.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Limit does not exist.
This is equivalent to evaluating the limit y→∞limsinysiny.
If y=πn, for any positive integer n, then sinysiny is always undefined, so there exists a subsequence such that this expression does not converge.
In other words: If it converges, then all its subsequences also converges. But since there is at least one subsequence that doesn't converge, then the limit does not converge.
Relevant article: Subsequences.
I think the limit of this function will come out to be 1, hence we can cancel both the term. At any value of x, the numerator and denominator will have the same value whose range will be between -1 and 1 .
I am expecting the community to give more insights on this topic. https://brilliant.org/profile/calvin-8u8hog/
Log in to reply
I agree with Pi Han Goh's answer. If a subsequence does not converge, (in this case isn't even well-defined), the original sequence does not converge, i.e., the given limit does not exist.
Log in to reply
But, if y isn't a multiple of pi, then can't 1 be the answer as both numerator and denominator will cancel out?
I also found Pi Han Goh's answer great.
Log in to reply
an=nπ is not well-defined and thus does not converge. So while sin(y)sin(y)=1 for all but a countably infinite number of points, the points nπ where it does not equal 1 form an infinite sequence that does not converge and thus dictates the non-convergence of the given limit.
For the limit to exist, every subsequence must converge, but the subsequenceLog in to reply
Thank You!
Thank you for explaining it to me. I was looking for a well expounded and concise explanation and I got one :)
Log in to reply
I've created a problem based on this very question.
I stand by those whose answer doesn't exist. I think according to abstract algebra algebra cancellation law holds only for non zero and known finite (also unique) numbers
Log in to reply
This has nothing to do with abstract algebra.