This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Oh, sorry, you were just wanting a name. I have no idea if it has a specific name, but it seems to be an exercise in the application of the Cosine Law. I can think of one other way of trying to solve it, but I haven't worked out the details of that approach yet.
I'm sorry if I spoiled this question for posting. I just saw it as an interesting problem and immediately had to solve it. You could delete this note and then post the problem after; I would be fine with that. :)
Yeah, I know. I don't think it's a big problem, since this posts has no likes or re-shares. Sorry about this; I had no idea about the question's "history" at the time I posted my solution. :(
@Daniel Liu
–
O.k., I'm glad. And yes, I did gloss over that detail, and even though it does seem obvious it would require a proof. At this stage, though, I'm just going to stick with "And clearly, θ>2π". :)
I think I did see this problem somewhere else posted in Brilliant, but I can't think of the name of either the problem or the creator. Brian's answer is correct, though.
Well, that made it easy for me to solve [deleted]'s question, then. :) Having found a solution assuming that θ was obtuse it is clear that θ can be obtuse, but I neglected to prove that θ would necessarily have to be obtuse. I see that in response to [deleted]'s solution to his own problem, Ariel Gershon has proved this to be the case.
@Math Man
–
Yeah, I know. I wonder if I should delete my answer now. I had no idea the question had been asked on Brilliant before until Michael posted the link. It's not fair to [deleted] if people can now cheat on his question, but Guiseppi asked this question independently so I don't want to delete my answer to his question.
Hi Michael. In light of Math Man's comment below, I'm wondering if it's a good idea having the link to [deleted]'s question posted here. whatever you decide is fine, but I just thought I should give you a heads up. I could delete my answer, but then that would defeat the point of Guiseppi's post.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I'm getting a value of r=553+619,
which equals 3.9788 rounded to 4 decimal places. Is that what you got? I'll write up my method shortly.
Edit: Label the triangle so that OA=3 and AB=2. Also, label the length 1 line segment AP and let ∠OAB=θ.
Then OP=r and ∠OAP=23π−θ. We can now apply the Cosine Law to triangles ΔOAB and ΔOAP to obtain the equations
(i) r2=32+22−2∗3∗2∗cos(θ)⟹13−12cos(θ), and
(ii) r2=32+12−2∗3∗1∗cos(23π−θ)⟹10+6sin(θ).
Equating (i) and (ii) we then have that
13−12cos(θ)=10+6sin(θ)⟹1−4cos(θ)=2sin(θ).
Now square both sides and simplify to find that
1−8cos(θ)+16cos2(θ)=4∗(1−cos2(θ))⟹20cos2(θ)−8cos(θ)−3=0,
which has solutions cos(θ)=2∗208±64+4∗3∗20=51±1019.
Now from the diagram we are looking for θ>2π, i.e., cos(θ)<0, se we take the root
cos(θ)=51−1019.
Now substitute this value into (i) to find that
r2=13−12∗(51−1019)=553+619,
and so r=553+619.
Log in to reply
Hi, Brian, what's the name of the problem?
Log in to reply
Oh, sorry, you were just wanting a name. I have no idea if it has a specific name, but it seems to be an exercise in the application of the Cosine Law. I can think of one other way of trying to solve it, but I haven't worked out the details of that approach yet.
I'm sorry if I spoiled this question for posting. I just saw it as an interesting problem and immediately had to solve it. You could delete this note and then post the problem after; I would be fine with that. :)
Uh oh, answer spoiled? D:
Log in to reply
Yeah, I know. I don't think it's a big problem, since this posts has no likes or re-shares. Sorry about this; I had no idea about the question's "history" at the time I posted my solution. :(
Log in to reply
θ>2π, although it may be obvious.
Nah, it's fine. You also forgot to prove thatLog in to reply
θ>2π". :)
O.k., I'm glad. And yes, I did gloss over that detail, and even though it does seem obvious it would require a proof. At this stage, though, I'm just going to stick with "And clearly,I think I did see this problem somewhere else posted in Brilliant, but I can't think of the name of either the problem or the creator. Brian's answer is correct, though.
Okay, I've found the problem, posted by [Deleted]
[Deleted]
Log in to reply
Well, that made it easy for me to solve [deleted]'s question, then. :) Having found a solution assuming that θ was obtuse it is clear that θ can be obtuse, but I neglected to prove that θ would necessarily have to be obtuse. I see that in response to [deleted]'s solution to his own problem, Ariel Gershon has proved this to be the case.
Log in to reply
lol free rating...
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
no free shot to lv5 geometry attempt
Hi Michael. In light of Math Man's comment below, I'm wondering if it's a good idea having the link to [deleted]'s question posted here. whatever you decide is fine, but I just thought I should give you a heads up. I could delete my answer, but then that would defeat the point of Guiseppi's post.
Log in to reply
Okay, deleted, as I noticed that problem has just now been reshared.
Log in to reply
its title is this: [deleted]
Moderator's note: please do not post spoilers