This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
you cannot write root(a) root(b) as root(ab) if a and b are both negative numbers,,,
certain laws of exponents holds only for positive real numbers,, and why?
specifically because it leads to contradictions as root(-1) root (-1) = root(-1*-1)=root(1)=1 which is not true,,,
instead we write it as
−a−b=iaib=−abandnot(−1)(−1)ab=ab
you did the same contradiction in a rather elongated fashion and i can show that your way is same as the one i pointed above,,
Look at the 2nd step....
the result you obtained by exchanging signs among roots is a logical fallacy,
I'm searching for a rigorous fault, and I could find some possibilities. I don't like −1 being replaced by ι, cuz ι=±−1, though I may be wrong. There may be something extraneous done while playing with the square roots and squares.
@Apoorv Srivastava
–
Ok . So is there any RULE which says that ba=ba , if and only if both a and b are positive. It is true for both negatives too. And also true in one way :if one of them is positive and the other one is negative, for eg : 2−1=2−1=i.21 . Here i denotes iota.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
you cannot write root(a) root(b) as root(ab) if a and b are both negative numbers,,,
certain laws of exponents holds only for positive real numbers,, and why? specifically because it leads to contradictions as root(-1) root (-1) = root(-1*-1)=root(1)=1 which is not true,,,
instead we write it as
−a−b=iaib=−abandnot(−1)(−1)ab=ab you did the same contradiction in a rather elongated fashion and i can show that your way is same as the one i pointed above,,
Look at the 2nd step.... the result you obtained by exchanging signs among roots is a logical fallacy,
instead you should write
b−a=bia=−iba=−−baandthenucorrectlyget−1=−1allbackagain
Log in to reply
ure right ! ....... great mathematician LEONHARD EULER did the same mistake once! {of course in a slightly different manner}
I'm searching for a rigorous fault, and I could find some possibilities. I don't like −1 being replaced by ι, cuz ι=±−1, though I may be wrong. There may be something extraneous done while playing with the square roots and squares.
Log in to reply
If I say that
ba=ba , only if a and b are both positive or both negative...
And if exactly one of a and b is positive, then
ba=i.∣b∣∣a∣.
You can say that i am trying to make a new rule , which would give its best to control some functionings of such expressions.
One rule I know is a.b=a.b ; if and only if at least one of a and b is non-negative. And the second rule may be which i discussed above :P
Log in to reply
So is the rule stated by you true or not ? I have read about the latter but not the first one.
Log in to reply
Isn'tba=ba possible when a and b are positive
Log in to reply
Offcourse, you can write it ; if a and b are both positive. But what in case of above contradiction ?
Log in to reply
I am saying that you can split the term only if the statement i said is true then your 3 rd step will be wrong
Log in to reply
ba=ba , if and only if both a and b are positive. It is true for both negatives too. And also true in one way :if one of them is positive and the other one is negative, for eg : 2−1=2−1=i.21 . Here i denotes iota.
Ok . So is there any RULE which says thatRoots with complex donot follow distributive law of algebra