This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
I do not think that you can add the inequalities. The thing is that the three inequalities that you have added do not take minimum value for the same x and y. If all the three took minimum value for same x and y, then we could say that LHS is greater than or equal to 17root2. But now we can only say that it is strictly greater than 17root2.
Indeed. What he has shown is that 172 is a lower bound. However, he has not shown that this is the maximum possible lower bound, which would then be the minimum of the function.
For example, it is obvious that x2+144≥0 and y2+25≥0, which tells us that x2+144+y2+25≥0. But clearly, 0 is merely a lower bound of the expression, and is not equal to the minimum value of this function.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I do not think that you can add the inequalities. The thing is that the three inequalities that you have added do not take minimum value for the same x and y. If all the three took minimum value for same x and y, then we could say that LHS is greater than or equal to 17root2. But now we can only say that it is strictly greater than 17root2.
Thank you for taking the time to put this up.
Log in to reply
Indeed. What he has shown is that 172 is a lower bound. However, he has not shown that this is the maximum possible lower bound, which would then be the minimum of the function.
For example, it is obvious that x2+144≥0 and y2+25≥0, which tells us that x2+144+y2+25≥0. But clearly, 0 is merely a lower bound of the expression, and is not equal to the minimum value of this function.
Ok I've understood this. And trying the problem to solve geometrically.