In this note, we will show the necessary conditions for two sequences of reals, ak and bk such that equality is reached by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality. I believe this fact is already presented in the Cauchy-Schwarz Brilliant Wiki, but I don't believe it was shown in this manner. First, we begin with a statement of the inequality:
(k=1∑nakbk)2≤(k=1∑nak2)(k=1∑nbk2)
Now, subtracting to yield a non-negative result,
(k=1∑nak2)(k=1∑nbk2)−(k=1∑nakbk)2≥0
This expression can be expanded and then neatly, intuitively compacted into summation notation. Also, we'll be leaving behind the inequality sign in exchange for an equal sign, since we're focusing on the equality case.
(a12+a22+...+an2)(b12+b22+...+bn2)−(a1b1+a2b2+...+anbn)2=0
(i=1∑nj=1∑nai2bj2)−(i=1∑nj=1∑naibiajbj)=0
21(i=1∑nj=1∑nai2bj2+aj2bi2)−(i=1∑nj=1∑naibiajbj)=0
Now, combining our double sums:
21(i=1∑nj=1∑nai2bj2−2aibjajbi+aj2bi2)=21(i=1∑nj=1∑n(aibj−ajbi)2)=0
If (b1,b2,...,bn)=0, then bk=0 for some k. For equality to occur, the above expression must equal 0, and so each term of the double sum must equal 0. Considering only the positive terms bk, it follows that equality holds with the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality if and only if akbi=aibk for all i such that 1≤i≤n and for some value of k.
Dividing both sides of this relation by bi and bk and setting γ=bkak, we reach the fact that biai=γ. In other words, our sequences ak and bk must be proportional for the equality case of the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality.
#Algebra
#CauchySchwarzInequality
#EqualityCase
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
interesting! I love the proof, especially the usage of summations. But I think the last portion of the argument is not valid.
We only assumed bk to be non-zero. bi could be zero, making division by b_i wrong. Is that not true?
Did you mean non-zero? b_k could be negative, no?