s=s... again?

view my set

we remember that n=1Ch(n)ns=2ζ(2s)+ζ(s)\sum_{n=1}^\infty\dfrac{Ch(n)}{n^s}=-2\zeta(2s)+\zeta(s) consider Cs(n)=(Ch1)(n)=dnCh(d)Cs(n)=(Ch*1)(n)=\sum_{d|n}Ch(d) so, if d is a perfect square it is -1, 1 otherwise. if there are k perfect square divisors, there are τ(n)k\tau(n)-k non-square divisor. add them and it is τ(n)2k\tau(n)-2k.

let k be a function of n. It is multiplicative. So we can compute for prime powers k(pa)=d2pad0=10+(p2)0+(p4)0+....(p2a2)0=a2+1k(p^a)=\sum_{d^2|p^a} d^{0}=1^0+(p^2)^0+(p^4)^0+.... \left(p^{2\lfloor \dfrac{a}{2}\rfloor}\right)^0=\lfloor \dfrac{a}{2}\rfloor+1 we have n=1Ch(n)nsn=11ns=n=1τ(n)ns2n=1k(n)ns\sum_{n=1}^\infty\dfrac{Ch(n)}{n^s}\sum_{n=1}^\infty\dfrac{1}{n^s}=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\dfrac{\tau(n)}{n^s}-2\sum_{n=1}^\infty\dfrac{k(n)}{n^s} 2ζ(s)ζ(2s)+ζ2(s)=ζ2(s)2n=1k(n)ns-2\zeta(s)\zeta(2s)+\zeta^2(s)=\zeta^2(s)-2\sum_{n=1}^\infty\dfrac{k(n)}{n^s} n=1k(n)ns=ζ(s)ζ(2s)\sum_{n=1}^\infty\dfrac{k(n)}{n^s}=\zeta(s)\zeta(2s) Lets try to compute the summation using the fact it is multpicative p=primea0k(pa)pas=p=primea0a2+1pas=p=primep3s(ps1)2(ps+1)=p1(1ps)21ps1p2s=ζ2(s)ζ(2s)ζ(s)=ζ(s)ζ(2s)\prod_{p=prime} \sum_{a≥0}\dfrac{k(p^a)}{p^{as}}=\prod_{p=prime} \sum_{a≥0}\dfrac{\lfloor \dfrac{a}{2}\rfloor+1}{p^{as}}=\prod_{p=prime} \dfrac{p^{3s}}{(p^s-1)^2(p^s+1)}\\=\prod_p \dfrac{1}{(1-p^{-s})^2}\dfrac{1-p^ {-s}}{1-p^{-2s}}=\zeta^2(s)\dfrac{\zeta(2s)}{\zeta(s)}=\zeta(s)\zeta(2s) so we get s=s\boxed{\large{s=s}} again!!!

#Calculus

Note by Aareyan Manzoor
5 years, 4 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

The combo part was not found by me but @Andrew Ellinor so he gets the credit for that.

He was not sure wether or not he was correct but this proves that k(n)=i=1ω(n)(ki2+1)k(n)=\prod_{i=1}^{\omega(n)} (\lfloor \dfrac{k_i}{2}\rfloor +1) if n=p1k1p2k2.....pω(n)kω(n)n=p_1^{k_1}p_2^{k_2}.....p_{\omega(n)}^{k_{\omega(n)}}

Aareyan Manzoor - 5 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Well he is correct.

Julian Poon - 5 years, 4 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...