Click on the First Link!

Here's something you'll find incredibly interesting if you don't already know about it.

Take any article on Wikipedia. Any article.

Then follow these instructions:

1)1) Click on the first link on that article text not in parentheses [brackets] and/or italics.

2)2) Repeat step 11

You'll eventually end up in Philosophy.

This is however not full-proof. As of May 26, 2011, this happens with 94.52% of all articles on Wikipedia. The rest of them either link to pages with no other links or lead to pages that do not exist. Some of them get stuck in loops.

As an example, I started with 'Asian Cuisine' and eventually got to Philosophy.

Asian CuisineHistory of ChinaYellow River\text{Asian Cuisine} \rightarrow \text{History of China} \rightarrow\text{Yellow River}RiverWatercourseWaterChemical Compound\rightarrow \text{River} \rightarrow\text{Watercourse} \rightarrow\text{Water} \rightarrow\text{Chemical Compound}Chemical substanceChemistryOutline of Physical Science\rightarrow \text{Chemical substance}\rightarrow \text{Chemistry} \rightarrow\text{Outline of Physical Science}PhysicsNatural ScienceScienceKnowledgeFact \rightarrow\text{Physics} \rightarrow\text{Natural Science} \rightarrow\text{Science} \rightarrow\text{Knowledge} \rightarrow\text{Fact}ProofNecessity and SufficiencyLogicReason \rightarrow\text{Proof} \rightarrow\text{Necessity and Sufficiency} \rightarrow\text{Logic}\rightarrow \text{Reason}\rightarrowConsciousnessQualityPhilosophy \text{Consciousness} \rightarrow\text{Quality} \rightarrow\text{Philosophy}

I came to know of this awesome fact from xkcd.


And the picture is taken from Wikipedia itself!

#JustForFun #Philosophy #RandomFacts #Trivia #Wikipedia

Note by Mursalin Habib
7 years ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Compare with the Collatz Conjecture :)

Ishan Singh - 7 years ago

MIND = BLOWN

Yan Yau Cheng - 7 years ago

What happens when you continue after Philosophy ?

Abhishek Sinha - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

You probably just wind up back at Philosophy.

Finn Hulse - 7 years ago

Finn is right. I checked.

Mursalin Habib - 7 years ago

That is awesome.

Finn Hulse - 7 years ago

Awesome!

Akshay Bodhare - 6 years, 4 months ago

I made it fro Google to Philosophy.

Sharky Kesa - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

from Richard Rusczyk to Philisophy

David Lee - 7 years ago

Seriously awesome man....!

milind prabhu - 7 years ago

Srsly! From Natural Science even mine is the SAME as yours! I started with D-day naval deceptions :D

Shreya R - 7 years ago

What strikes me about this is the fact that one could try this thing with any link of Wikipedia, not just the first one, and as the next page is an article in itself, there always remains a statistical probability of ending up in 'Philosophy' if one is willing to carry on indefinitely. However, the chance is incredibly small and it would take a hell lot of time to reach the destination.

Arko Bhaumik - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

What are you trying to say can be formalized by using a simple probabilistic machinary called Markov Chain. In fact it is a very special Markov Chain called random walks over graphs (whose nodes are the set of all wiki pages and there is an edge between node a to node b if the page a contains a hyperlink to page b). Given sufficient "niceness" property on the underlying graph, you can even derive expected time to revisit a certain page etc and surprisingly this quantity is dictated by another graphical property called "equivalent resistance" of the graph (mathematically the same thing that you study in electrical networks).

Abhishek Sinha - 7 years ago

e(mathematical constant) to Philosophy..........And the last few steps( starting from Science ) were exactly the same as Mursalin's!

Tan Li Xuan - 7 years ago

Nice!

Avineil Jain - 7 years ago

till ''logic'' , its different for many, Logic comes up for all that i tried and from there its same..

Pradeep Ch - 7 years ago

Reached Philosophy from Fifa Football World Cup

Daksh Walia - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

reached from prime

math man - 6 years, 9 months ago

sprb!!!!!! (Y)

Adarsh singh - 7 years ago

Is there any reason behind this?

Ritu Roy - 7 years ago

I opened an article on Wikipedia about Wikipedia(LOL) and started: WikipediaGratisRemunerationCompensation(Wikitionary)Old FrenchGallo-Romance LanguagesRomance LanguagesVulgar LatinSociolinguisticsSocietyHumanHomininiTribe(Biology)BiologyNatural ScienceScienceKnowledgeAwarenessConsciousnessQuality(Philosophy)Philosophy\text{Wikipedia}\rightarrow \text{Gratis}\rightarrow\text{Remuneration}\rightarrow\text{Compensation(Wikitionary)}\rightarrow\text{Old French}\\ \rightarrow\text{Gallo-Romance Languages}\rightarrow\text{Romance Languages}\rightarrow\text{Vulgar Latin}\rightarrow\text{Sociolinguistics}\\ \rightarrow\text{Society}\rightarrow\text{Human}\rightarrow\text{Hominini}\rightarrow\text{Tribe(Biology)}\\ \rightarrow\text{Biology}\rightarrow\text{Natural Science}\rightarrow\text{Science}\rightarrow\text{Knowledge}\\ \rightarrow\text{Awareness}\rightarrow\text{Consciousness}\rightarrow\text{Quality(Philosophy)}\rightarrow\boxed{\text{Philosophy}}

Abdur Rehman Zahid - 6 years, 4 months ago

Really an amazing truth

Kalpok Guha - 6 years, 4 months ago

this is awesome mind blowing

rahul kharbanda - 5 years, 9 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...