Problem 2. (5 points) Let
N=(20130)+(20133)+(20136)+⋯+(20132013).N=\binom{2013}{0}+\binom{2013}{3}+\binom{2013}{6}+\dots+\binom{2013}{2013}.N=(02013)+(32013)+(62013)+⋯+(20132013).
If 3N=a2013+b2013+c20133N=a^{2013}+b^{2013}+c^{2013}3N=a2013+b2013+c2013 where a+b+c=3a+b+c=3a+b+c=3, find the value of abc.abc.abc.
Note by Cody Johnson 7 years, 6 months ago
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
_italics_
**bold**
__bold__
- bulleted- list
1. numbered2. list
paragraph 1paragraph 2
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
This is a quote
# I indented these lines # 4 spaces, and now they show # up as a code block. print "hello world"
\(
\)
\[
\]
2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
I did in this way:
(1+x)2013=(20130)+(20131)x+(20132)x2+…(20132012)x2012+(20132013)x2013(1 + x)^{2013} = {2013 \choose 0} + {2013 \choose 1}x + {2013 \choose 2}x^2+ \dots {2013 \choose 2012}x^{2012} + {2013 \choose 2013}x^{2013}(1+x)2013=(02013)+(12013)x+(22013)x2+…(20122013)x2012+(20132013)x2013
Hence , in (1+x)2013+(1+ωx)2013+(1+ω2x)2013,(1 + x)^{2013} + (1 + \omega x)^{2013} + (1+ \omega^2 x)^{2013},(1+x)2013+(1+ωx)2013+(1+ω2x)2013, coeff. of x3k+1x^{3k + 1}x3k+1 and x3k+2x^{3k + 2}x3k+2 becomes 0 , and coeff. of x3kx^{3k}x3k triples
Now, Replace x = 1,
(1+1)2013+(1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013(1 + 1)^{2013} + (1 + \omega )^{2013} + (1+ \omega^2 )^{2013}(1+1)2013+(1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013
= 3((20130)+(20133)+(20136)+⋯+(20132013))3\bigg({2013 \choose 0} + {2013 \choose 3} + {2013 \choose 6} + \dots + {2013 \choose 2013}\bigg)3((02013)+(32013)+(62013)+⋯+(20132013))
= 3N3N3N
Hence, 3N=(1+1)2013+(1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)20133N = (1 + 1)^{2013} + (1 + \omega)^{2013} + ( 1+ \omega^2)^{2013}3N=(1+1)2013+(1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013
Hence , a=2,b=1+ω,c=1+ω2a = 2, b = 1+\omega, c = 1 + \omega^2a=2,b=1+ω,c=1+ω2, a+b+c=3+(1+ω+ω2)=3a + b+ c = 3 + (1 + \omega + \omega^2) = 3a+b+c=3+(1+ω+ω2)=3, as required.
abc=2(1+ω)(1+ω2)=2abc = 2(1 + \omega)(1 + \omega^2) = \fbox{2}abc=2(1+ω)(1+ω2)=2
Log in to reply
Exactly how I did it. Good work, you get the 5 points!
Edit: Pi Han Goh is actually the winner.
The same process is followed be me!
Where did the omega come from?
ω\omegaω is usually used to denote eπi/3=cisπ3e^{\pi i /3} = \text{cis} \dfrac{\pi}{3}eπi/3=cis3π (although he should have specified).
@Michael Tang – Michael, do you mean ω=e2πi/3\omega=e^{2\pi i/3}ω=e2πi/3?
@Michael Tang – Thanks. Now it makes sense.
Considering that you're using a discussion instead of requiring an integer answer, you should adjust your question accordingly.
The way your question is currently phrased, there are (likely to be) numerous answers. Think of a (complex) plane cutting a sucked in ball. We know that there are 6 points of intersection, and this plane is unlikely to be tangential at each of these points.
Actually, I believe Cody is asking for integer answers.
Tell me this - if an integer answer is required by the problem, doesn't that force the user to find the integer answer only? A line in the solution would be like, "And, since we're guaranteed an integer answer, then 2\boxed{2}2 is the only number that satisfies the problem condition."
Note that I've computed that 222 is the only integer answer for this problem.
The problem should stand along by itself, without requiring the reader to know that "only integer answers are allowed". If this is a necessary assumption, it should be clearly stated in the question that you are only looking for integer answers. The question, as stated, could have several answers in a neighborhood of 2. It could be interpreted as finding the range of possible values of abc abcabc.
Note that Jatin's solution only shows that abc=2abc=2 abc=2 is a possible answer, you should explain why no other integer answers are possible.
@Calvin Lin – So would it be better to say, "find the only possible integer value of abcabcabc?" Or maybe I should've asked for some completely different thing, like to find N(mod2011)N\pmod{2011}N(mod2011)?
@Cody Johnson – I think it would have been better to ask for a closed form expression for NNN, and 22013−23 \frac{2^{2013} -2 } {3} 322013−2 would have been a good answer. There isn't a strong reason for you to stick to "integer answers from 0 to 999". We do that simply because it is the simplest to explain, without having to deal with various other explanations / considerations.
By asking for "the only possible integer value of abcabcabc", you then require a proof that it is the only possible integer value, which need not necessarily be the case. Yes, there is a natural choice of a,b,ca, b, ca,b,c in your question, but this need not be the only solution. It is possible for abc=0abc=0 abc=0, by setting c=0c=0c=0 and a2013+(3−a)2013=22013−2 a^{2013} + (3-a)^{2013} = 2^{2013} -2 a2013+(3−a)2013=22013−2, and showing that a solution must exist by applying the intermediate value theorem on [0,1.5] [0, 1.5] [0,1.5] (real interval). However, this strays away from the original intention of your question.
Note: I do not know if abc=1abc=1abc=1 is possible. It most likely is, but I can't think of an immediate argument for it.
Yes, but that's not a good problem-solving tactic neither is it good problem-writing practice to do that.
yes 2 is the answer
3N=22013−23N = 2^{2013} -23N=22013−2, one choice for a,b,ca,b,ca,b,c are 2,−x,−x22, -x, -x^22,−x,−x2 where x2+x+1=0x^2+x+1=0x2+x+1=0. So abc=2abc=2abc=2 in this case. But ..
3N≠22013−23N\neq2^{2013}-23N=22013−2
Actually, 3N=22013−23N = 2^{2013} - 2 3N=22013−2, I have proved that in my deleted comment. I've removed my comment because I couldn't prove that abc=2abc=2 abc=2 only like what Jatin did.
@Pi Han Goh – You are right, 3N=22013−23N = 2^{2013} - 23N=22013−2
Actually, 3N=22013+(1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)20133N = 2^{2013} + (1 + \omega)^{2013} + (1 + \omega^2)^{2013}3N=22013+(1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013
= 22013+2Re(1+ω)2013=22013+2Re(eiπ3×2013) 2^{2013} + 2Re(1 + \omega)^{2013} = 2^{2013} + 2 Re(e^{i\frac{\pi}{3} \times 2013})22013+2Re(1+ω)2013=22013+2Re(ei3π×2013)
= 22013−22^{2013} - 222013−2
How did you prove it?
@Jatin Yadav – I first consider N0=(00),N1=(30)+(33),N2=(60)+(63)+(66),…,N671=(20130)+(20133)+…(20132013) N_0 = {0 \choose 0}, N_1 = {3 \choose 0} + { 3 \choose 3 }, N_2 = {6 \choose 0 } + {6 \choose 3 } + { 6 \choose 6} , \ldots , N_{671} = {2013 \choose 0 } + {2013 \choose 3 } + \ldots {2013 \choose 2013} N0=(00),N1=(03)+(33),N2=(06)+(36)+(66),…,N671=(02013)+(32013)+…(20132013)
And I find that 3N0,3N1,3N2,3N33N_0, 3N_1, 3N_2, 3N_3 3N0,3N1,3N2,3N3 are very close to the powers of 888, so I made the conjecture 3Nj=8j+2(−1)j3 N_j = 8^j + 2(-1)^j 3Nj=8j+2(−1)j and I proved it by induction with the help of Pascal's identities, it was a little tedious.
Great job by the way!
@Jatin Yadav – Hi Jatin!
How do you get (1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013=2Re(1+ω)2013 (1+\omega)^{2013}+(1+\omega^2)^{2013}=2Re(1+\omega)^{2013} (1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013=2Re(1+ω)2013?
I did it this way, since 1+ω+ω2=01+\omega+\omega^2=01+ω+ω2=0, hence we have 1+ω=−ω21+\omega=-\omega^21+ω=−ω2 and 1+ω2=−ω1+\omega^2=-\omega1+ω2=−ω.
Therefore, (1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013=−2(1+\omega)^{2013}+(1+\omega^2)^{2013}=-2(1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013=−2.
Many thanks!
@Pranav Arora – Hi, (1+ω)2013(1+\omega)^{2013}(1+ω)2013 is conjugate of (1+ω2)2013(1 + \omega^2)^{2013}(1+ω2)2013,
and z+zˉ=2Re(z)z + \bar{z} = 2Re(z)z+zˉ=2Re(z), well known identity in complex nos.
@Jatin Yadav – Thanks Jatin! :)
@Pi Han Goh – Whoops, my bad. I guess it does.
1
abc = 1 ?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I did in this way:
(1+x)2013=(02013)+(12013)x+(22013)x2+…(20122013)x2012+(20132013)x2013
Hence , in (1+x)2013+(1+ωx)2013+(1+ω2x)2013, coeff. of x3k+1 and x3k+2 becomes 0 , and coeff. of x3k triples
Now, Replace x = 1,
(1+1)2013+(1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013
= 3((02013)+(32013)+(62013)+⋯+(20132013))
= 3N
Hence, 3N=(1+1)2013+(1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013
Hence , a=2,b=1+ω,c=1+ω2, a+b+c=3+(1+ω+ω2)=3, as required.
abc=2(1+ω)(1+ω2)=2
Log in to reply
Exactly how I did it. Good work, you get the 5 points!
Edit: Pi Han Goh is actually the winner.
The same process is followed be me!
Where did the omega come from?
Log in to reply
ω is usually used to denote eπi/3=cis3π (although he should have specified).
Log in to reply
ω=e2πi/3?
Michael, do you meanConsidering that you're using a discussion instead of requiring an integer answer, you should adjust your question accordingly.
The way your question is currently phrased, there are (likely to be) numerous answers. Think of a (complex) plane cutting a sucked in ball. We know that there are 6 points of intersection, and this plane is unlikely to be tangential at each of these points.
Log in to reply
Actually, I believe Cody is asking for integer answers.
Tell me this - if an integer answer is required by the problem, doesn't that force the user to find the integer answer only? A line in the solution would be like, "And, since we're guaranteed an integer answer, then 2 is the only number that satisfies the problem condition."
Note that I've computed that 2 is the only integer answer for this problem.
Log in to reply
The problem should stand along by itself, without requiring the reader to know that "only integer answers are allowed". If this is a necessary assumption, it should be clearly stated in the question that you are only looking for integer answers. The question, as stated, could have several answers in a neighborhood of 2. It could be interpreted as finding the range of possible values of abc.
Note that Jatin's solution only shows that abc=2 is a possible answer, you should explain why no other integer answers are possible.
Log in to reply
abc?" Or maybe I should've asked for some completely different thing, like to find N(mod2011)?
So would it be better to say, "find the only possible integer value ofLog in to reply
N, and 322013−2 would have been a good answer. There isn't a strong reason for you to stick to "integer answers from 0 to 999". We do that simply because it is the simplest to explain, without having to deal with various other explanations / considerations.
I think it would have been better to ask for a closed form expression forBy asking for "the only possible integer value of abc", you then require a proof that it is the only possible integer value, which need not necessarily be the case. Yes, there is a natural choice of a,b,c in your question, but this need not be the only solution. It is possible for abc=0, by setting c=0 and a2013+(3−a)2013=22013−2, and showing that a solution must exist by applying the intermediate value theorem on [0,1.5] (real interval). However, this strays away from the original intention of your question.
Note: I do not know if abc=1 is possible. It most likely is, but I can't think of an immediate argument for it.
Yes, but that's not a good problem-solving tactic neither is it good problem-writing practice to do that.
yes 2 is the answer
3N=22013−2, one choice for a,b,c are 2,−x,−x2 where x2+x+1=0. So abc=2 in this case. But ..
Log in to reply
3N=22013−2
Log in to reply
Actually, 3N=22013−2, I have proved that in my deleted comment. I've removed my comment because I couldn't prove that abc=2 only like what Jatin did.
Log in to reply
3N=22013−2
You are right,Actually, 3N=22013+(1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013
= 22013+2Re(1+ω)2013=22013+2Re(ei3π×2013)
= 22013−2
How did you prove it?
Log in to reply
N0=(00),N1=(03)+(33),N2=(06)+(36)+(66),…,N671=(02013)+(32013)+…(20132013)
I first considerAnd I find that 3N0,3N1,3N2,3N3 are very close to the powers of 8, so I made the conjecture 3Nj=8j+2(−1)j and I proved it by induction with the help of Pascal's identities, it was a little tedious.
Great job by the way!
How do you get (1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013=2Re(1+ω)2013?
I did it this way, since 1+ω+ω2=0, hence we have 1+ω=−ω2 and 1+ω2=−ω.
Therefore, (1+ω)2013+(1+ω2)2013=−2.
Many thanks!
Log in to reply
(1+ω)2013 is conjugate of (1+ω2)2013,
Hi,and z+zˉ=2Re(z), well known identity in complex nos.
Log in to reply
1
abc = 1 ?