This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Since for x>0, we have log(x+1)−log(x)=log(1+x1)>0 Thus the entire numerator of f′(x) is positive, same goes to the denominator of f′(x), thus f′(x) is strictly positive, or f(x) is an increasing function.
Thus f(3)<f(4)<f(5), we have log4log3<log5log4<log5log6 or
log43<log54<log65
Alternatively, suppose we consider their reciprocals log34,log45,log56
Perhaps this is the approach you are looking for: let a=log4(3); then 0<a<1 and 4a=3. So
5a=(4⋅45)a=4a⋅(5/4)a=3⋅(5/4)a<3⋅5/4=15/4<4,
which implies that a<log5(4). So we showed that log4(3)<log5(4). A very similar method also shows that log5(4)<log6(5).
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Lemma: If f(x) is a positive function that satisfies f(x+2)−f(x+1)<f(x+1)−f(x), then f(x+2)f(x)<f(x+1)2
Proof: Apply AM-GM.□
Note: This condition can be thought of as a concave function, in a discrete setting. This is all the calculus that is required.
Now apply this to f(x)=lnx for x≥2.
Show that log(x+1)log(x) is an increasing function for x>0, where the base is e.
Log in to reply
I dont know much Calculus....please write ur solution.Is there any simple method......?
Log in to reply
Let f(x)=log(x+1)log(x) for x>0
By Quotient Rule, we have f′(x)=(log(x+1))2log(x+1) ⋅x1−log(x) ⋅x+11 or
f′(x)=x(x+1) (log(x+1))2(x+1) log(x+1) −x log(x)
f′(x)=x(x+1)(log(x+1))2x(log(x+1)−log(x))+log(x+1)
Since for x>0, we have log(x+1)−log(x)=log(1+x1)>0 Thus the entire numerator of f′(x) is positive, same goes to the denominator of f′(x), thus f′(x) is strictly positive, or f(x) is an increasing function.
Thus f(3)<f(4)<f(5), we have log4log3<log5log4<log5log6 or
log43<log54<log65
Alternatively, suppose we consider their reciprocals log34,log45,log56
log34=log3(3∗34),log45=log4(4∗45),log56=log5(5∗56)
log34=1+log334,log45=1+log445,log56=log556
Since 1+log(x) is an increasing function, and because 34>45>56
Then log34>log45>log56 or log43<log54<log65
Log in to reply
x>e ?
Why do you needLog in to reply
Is there any method using only algebra?
Log in to reply
Perhaps this is the approach you are looking for: let a=log4(3); then 0<a<1 and 4a=3. So 5a=(4⋅45)a=4a⋅(5/4)a=3⋅(5/4)a<3⋅5/4=15/4<4, which implies that a<log5(4). So we showed that log4(3)<log5(4). A very similar method also shows that log5(4)<log6(5).