Complex Networks 1

One of the most famous physicists of the 20th century, Richard Feynman liked comparing physics with the game of chess. You can view a nice video by him about this here. At least till the middle of 20th century, many physicists, including Feynman, maintained kind of reductionist viewpoint, that knowing the ultimate constituents of matter around us and laws of interaction of these constituents is the most important part of physics and rest is details. Even at present most of the physicists have the similar viewpoint. (I am really not in a position to debate over this point!)

But let us try to use the analogy with chess again. Most of us including I, understand all the rules of chess, how Bishop moves and so on. In fact its at all not difficult to learn these rules. But then does that mean that my understanding of chess is equal to Garry Kasparov's? In chess, even modern supercomputers face practically infinite possibilities and new surprises keep coming every day though the rules are same! This shows that physics or science in general does not end with finding "fundamental rules" at all. In fact we have only started to play the game! Just think about some of the systems we know about.. In a small volume of seed of the plant, somehow the whole information about the structure of giant tree is stored! At low temperatures, when many atoms are together, somehow they start behaving completely differently than a single atom, something which is called as Bose-Einstein condensate! Somehow from almost homogeneous phase at the start of the universe, today we see beautiful structures formed at all levels: from clusters of galaxies to individual planets! Though we know the laws of interactions of molecules to a very good degree, we still don't understand totally the mechanisms at work inside the living cells, let alone the whole organism. We don't understand how our brain works, perhaps the most spectacular object in our universe! We don't understand how to describe fluids when they become turbulent and we don't have good answers to big avalanches taking place in the economical world! We don't understand how something as remarkable as life could be formed on this very planet and we don't understand if we could explain morality using laws of quantum mechanics!

I hope that I could convince you that we have really just started to play the game and there is long long way to go about it. In the present series I will try to describe the particular way to approach the game, though there are several ways which sometimes look complementary and sometimes opposing. The way I am going to talk about is called "Theory of complex networks". In the very next article, I will start describing what is "complex network" and how many systems around us, called complex systems in general, can be described using this theme. So be ready for an exciting journey!

I would also like to have some feedback from you guys as how the series is going on and some suggestions too. :)

#Goldbach'sConjurersGroup #ComplexNetworks

Note by Snehal Shekatkar
7 years, 5 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Wow... This seems very interesting! :) Thank you for posting (and also for your future posts)! :D I'm sure we will all learn a lot from here

Happy Melodies - 7 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Thank you :)

Snehal Shekatkar - 7 years, 5 months ago

Sounds interesting.....Have you uploaded the next article??? And what is meant by relation between quantum mechanics and morality??

Eddie The Head - 7 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

I will upload articles with some time difference.. say 3-4 days..

About your second question: I simply wanted to give an example that knowing fundamental laws of interactions is not the end of the story. If all the basis of our universe is just quantum mechanics, that should explain everything that exists in our universe in principle including morality for example! How to describe that is the real catch we we don't know so far! :)

Snehal Shekatkar - 7 years, 5 months ago

Guys.. find the second article of this series here

Snehal Shekatkar - 7 years, 5 months ago

riveting, looking forward to the next article, special thanks for the feynman video

Sourav Chaudhuri - 7 years, 5 months ago

Very nice starting article!

Shishir Sankhyayan - 7 years, 5 months ago

will be waiting for the next article :)

Madhurjo Aishy - 7 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Soon! :)

Snehal Shekatkar - 7 years, 5 months ago

This is very nice Snehal Shekatkar.

Milly Choochoo - 7 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks Milly.. could you find next two articles also?

Snehal Shekatkar - 7 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, I will read them.

Milly Choochoo - 7 years, 5 months ago

Its a nice article and I appreciate your thoughts...

Akash Agrawal - 7 years, 5 months ago

quantum mechanics has nothing to do about the other branches as every other keeps its own standards.but yes complex in every sense

sunitha bhadragiri - 7 years, 5 months ago

You have a very nice explanation and presentation style. Thanks!

Kou$htav Chakrabarty - 7 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Thank you.. :)

Snehal Shekatkar - 7 years, 5 months ago

nice food for thought. Nice post!

siddharth shah - 7 years, 5 months ago

its a promising start ... and I look forward to learn and enjoy this new dimension of looking at our universe.

Madhusudan Ingale - 7 years, 5 months ago

Amazing read. Thanks sir.

Aditya Agarwal - 7 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks Aditya.. did you find next 2 articles too?

Snehal Shekatkar - 7 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

No as of now I didn't but i am definitely looking forward to the next two articles. I sure will find them.

Aditya Agarwal - 7 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Aditya Agarwal https://brilliant.org/discussions/thread/complex-networks-2/

Snehal Shekatkar - 7 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Snehal Shekatkar Thanks

Aditya Agarwal - 7 years, 5 months ago

Its exciting to know these stuffs....

anup bharti - 7 years, 5 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...