I tried the following approach.
Let \( z = \dfrac{ e^{ i \theta }}{2} \). Then using de Moivre's theorem:
n=1∑N2nsinnθ= Im (n=1∑Nzn)
This is sum of GP. Using the sum of GP:
n=1∑Nzn=1−2eiθ2eiθ(1−2NeNiθ)
This simplifies to:
n=1∑Nzn=2N(2−eiθ)eiθ(2N−eNiθ)
n=1∑Nzn=2N(2−eiθ)(2Neiθ−e(N+1)iθ) (∗)
Now I changed the complex numbers on the RHS from Euler's form to cis form, then made the denominator real and finally took imaginary part of the expression. Is there a simpler way to solve this problem? My method is very complicated, thus error-prone.
In fact, I have already made an error which is why I have posted this note. I am getting the RHS as
2N(5−4cosθ)2N+1sinθ−2sin(N+1)θ
i.e. without the sinNθ term in the numerator. Where is the sinNθ term coming from? There are only eiθ and e(N+1)iθ in the (∗) equation. I can't seem to find out where I have gone wrong.
Please help.
Thanks.
#Algebra
#ComplexNumbers
#DeMoivre'sFormula
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I think you are missing out any term. I solved the RHS and got the desired result. Recheck it. As far as i think this is a proofing problem and the method you followed is very simple and short i think. Just need some care while solving.
Log in to reply
Thanks Sachin :), I realized I was silly mistakes. I solved it again carefully and now I got the desired result.
take sin(x)=2−i(eix−e−ix. show this is true by de moivres.
Log in to reply
Thanks for helping Aareyan, this method is nice! :)