See the complete wiki page here.
The method of Componendo et Dividendo allows a quick way to do some calculations, and can simplify the amount of expansion needed.
If a,b,c and d are numbers such that b,d are non-zero and ba=dc, then
1. Componendo:2. Dividendo: Componendo et Dividendo: 3. For k=ba,4. For k=d−b,ba+bba−ba−kba+kbba=dc+d.=dc−d.=c−kdc+kd.=b+kda+kc.
This can be proven directly by observing that
1.ba+b=1ba+1=1dc+1=dc+d. 2.ba−b=1ba−1=1dc−1=dc−d. 3.a−kba+kb=ba−kba+k=dc−kdc+k=c−kdc+kd. 4.b+kda+kc=ba×1+kbd1+kac=ba.
Worked examples
1. Show the converse, namely that if a,b,c and d are numbers such that b,d,a−b,c−d are non-zero and a−ba+b=c−dc+d, then ba=dc.
Solution: We apply Componendo et Dividendo with k=1 (which is valid since a−ba+b=1 ), and get that
2b2a=(a+b)−(a−b)(a+b)+(a−b)=(c+d)−(c−d)(c+d)+(c−d)=2d2c.
Note: The converse of Componendo and Dividendo also holds, and we can prove it by applying Dividendo and Componendo respectively.
2. Solve for x: x+1x3+1=x−1x3−1.
Solution: For the fractions to make sense, we must have x=1,−1.
Cross multiplying, we get x3−1x3+1=x−1x+1.
Apply Componendo et Dividendo with k=1 (which is valid since x−1x+1=1 ), we get that 22x3=22x⇒x(x2−1)=0. However since x=1,−1, we have x=0 as the only solution.
Note: We also need to check the condition that the denominators are non-zero, but this is obvious.
#Algebra
#ComponendoEtDividendo
#KeyTechniques
#Olympiad
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
if a/b =c/d what will be the result by componendo dividendo
Log in to reply
See the statements contained in the first box.
Sorry I'm slightly confused, could you clarify what Componendo and Dividendo integrate to?
Log in to reply
Check out the examples on the componendo and dividendo wiki page.
I found out (somewhat accidentally) that
b+naa+mb=d+ncc+md
is also true. It's quite easy to prove; it can also be derived from the 4th case stated above. It seems different enough, though, to be worth a mention, yet I never see it anywhere. Or is it perhaps that there are many other such corollaries and only the most basic ones are usually listed?
Log in to reply
Ohhh, that's a really nice identity. It is a generalization of Worked Example 1. Can you add it to the Componendo and Dividendo wiki under Problem Solving?
Like you said, it is essentially / can be derived from the 4th case, where we have c+mda+mb=ca=db=d+ncb+na (as long as the denominators are non-zero).
Log in to reply
Have finally had a chance to add the identity to the Wiki; please take a look when you can and let me know if I need to make any changes. (I accidentally first added it to the Theorem section before I remembered that you said Problem Solving, I did move it to the correct section after that, hope it didn't cause any problems.) I also added an example applying it a little further down, in the section that introduced using C&D with non-linear terms. The Wiki mentioned the terms could be polynomial or exponential; my example uses trig functions, I believe it's still valid but please take a look and let me know if there are any issues. Thanks.
Log in to reply
Yes, your example with a trigo substitution is valid. Good one. Thanks!