This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Assuming that n≥2, we manipulate the equation to obtain
xn−1xn+1=x−1x+1
Thus, using Componendo et Dividendo with k=1 we deduce that
xn=22xn=(xn+1)−(xn−1)(xn+1)+(xn−1)=(x+1)−(x−1)(x+1)+(x−1)=22x=x
and hence x(xn−1−1)=0. We need to exclude both x=1 and x=−1 as solutions. Thus
There are n−1 roots when n is even, namely 0 and the n−2 complex (n−1)st roots of unity (1 omitted),
There are n−2 roots when n is odd, namely 0 and the n−3 complex (n−1)st roots of unity (1 and −1 omitted).
If n=1 then there are infinitely many roots.
If n=0 then there are no solutions.
If n<0 then the same algebraic steps as above hold, but we have to exclude 0 as a root, so the roots are the ∣n−1∣th roots of unity, with 1 and −1 excluded as necessary.
You did a great job with the cases. This question was tricky, in part because you have to be actively aware of the different conditions that were necessary for the arguments to hold.
It also shows why after manipulating an equation, you must always check that the values hold in the original equation. This is a step that is often forgotten, with students claiming that "a degree n polynomial must have n roots."
With n<0, most will also forget that they have to exclude 0 as a root. In this case, when n≤3 is an odd integer, then there are ∣n∣−3 roots. It is slightly interesting that for n=−3, we have no solutions, because all the possible solutions have to be rejected.
@Nicholas Rincon Reis
–
Yes, in the adjusted equation. However, when n=0, the first manipulation is not valid, and the arguments about n=0 are applied to the original equation. See Daniel C's comment.
Suppose if n is an even positive integer then we know that the polynomial[xn−1)] has n roots [not necessarily distinct]. Out of these n roots, two are 1,−1, so there are a total of n−2+1=n−1 solutions when n is an even positive integer. When n is odd, there n−1[except for n=1] solutions.
Note: It still needs to be shown that x must be distinct for all those solutions.
Note that I have ignored distinct solutions for x.
If n=0 there are no solutions to x.
If n is an odd positive integer, then there will be n−1+1=n solutions to the equation, since −1 wont be a root in this case.
If n is a non-positive integer, we let n=−k for some positive integer k and we get:
xk+1−1=0
If k is odd we have k−1[ 1,−1 are not solutions] solutions, and if k is even there are k[k+1 roots out of which −1 is not a solution] solutions.
Indeed. This is an example of how manipulating the equation, leads to a different set of solutions. For example, both of you dealt with
xn−1xn+1=x−1x+1
When n is odd, we have x=−1 as a solution. However, this case has to be rejected in my version, and it is good that you mentioned "Note that x=1,−1.
However, you should also have added the condition that xn−1=0, in order to allow you to divide by the term. It is a quick check that if xn=1, then there are no solutions to the equation, since we must have
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Typo:
Assuming that n≥2, we manipulate the equation to obtain xn−1xn+1=x−1x+1 Thus, using Componendo et Dividendo with k=1 we deduce that xn=22xn=(xn+1)−(xn−1)(xn+1)+(xn−1)=(x+1)−(x−1)(x+1)+(x−1)=22x=x and hence x(xn−1−1)=0. We need to exclude both x=1 and x=−1 as solutions. Thus
There are n−1 roots when n is even, namely 0 and the n−2 complex (n−1)st roots of unity (1 omitted),
There are n−2 roots when n is odd, namely 0 and the n−3 complex (n−1)st roots of unity (1 and −1 omitted).
If n=1 then there are infinitely many roots.
If n=0 then there are no solutions.
If n<0 then the same algebraic steps as above hold, but we have to exclude 0 as a root, so the roots are the ∣n−1∣th roots of unity, with 1 and −1 excluded as necessary.
Log in to reply
You did a great job with the cases. This question was tricky, in part because you have to be actively aware of the different conditions that were necessary for the arguments to hold.
It also shows why after manipulating an equation, you must always check that the values hold in the original equation. This is a step that is often forgotten, with students claiming that "a degree n polynomial must have n roots."
With n<0, most will also forget that they have to exclude 0 as a root. In this case, when n≤3 is an odd integer, then there are ∣n∣−3 roots. It is slightly interesting that for n=−3, we have no solutions, because all the possible solutions have to be rejected.
If n=0 then how can there be no solutions?
Log in to reply
If n=0, we get x+12=0, which is not possible.
Log in to reply
n in the denominator. Funny that.
Oh! yes, I forgot that there is no power ofalso if n=0, x^n-1 = 0. (x^n + 1)/0 = math error kkk
Log in to reply
n=0, the first manipulation is not valid, and the arguments about n=0 are applied to the original equation. See Daniel C's comment.
Yes, in the adjusted equation. However, whenxn−1xn+1=x−1x+1 Note that x=1,−1.
Apply dividendo to get:
xn−12=x−12
x(xn−1)=0
Suppose if n is an even positive integer then we know that the polynomial[xn−1)] has n roots [not necessarily distinct]. Out of these n roots, two are 1,−1, so there are a total of n−2+1=n−1 solutions when n is an even positive integer. When n is odd, there n−1[except for n=1] solutions.
Note: It still needs to be shown that x must be distinct for all those solutions.
Note that I have ignored distinct solutions for x.
If n=0 there are no solutions to x.
If n is an odd positive integer, then there will be n−1+1=n solutions to the equation, since −1 wont be a root in this case.
If n is a non-positive integer, we let n=−k for some positive integer k and we get:
xk+1−1=0
If k is odd we have k−1[ 1,−1 are not solutions] solutions, and if k is even there are k[k+1 roots out of which −1 is not a solution] solutions.
Log in to reply
Indeed. This is an example of how manipulating the equation, leads to a different set of solutions. For example, both of you dealt with
xn−1xn+1=x−1x+1
When n is odd, we have x=−1 as a solution. However, this case has to be rejected in my version, and it is good that you mentioned "Note that x=1,−1.
However, you should also have added the condition that xn−1=0, in order to allow you to divide by the term. It is a quick check that if xn=1, then there are no solutions to the equation, since we must have
x+12=0