This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
@Brian Charlesworth
–
For the first one of the terms on the other side and divide by (dxdy)3 on both the sides to get the equation of the form dy2d2x=−e2y
which is then trivial.
@Tanishq Varshney
–
It is simple. Start with (dydx)=(dxdy)−1. Then differentiate wrt y and apply chain rule on the other side to get the required answer.
@Tanishq Varshney
–
With dxdy=v we have, by way of the chain rule, that dx2d2y=dxdv=dydvdxdy=vdydv.
So we've converted the original second-order DE with x as the independent variable into a first-order DE with y as the independent variable. We can simplify a bit further by eliminating v=0 as a solution, giving us
dydv+e2yv2=0, which is separable with solution v=e2y+C2.
So now we have that dxdy=e2y+C2, which again is separable with solution 2e2y+Cy=2x+K,
where constants C and K would be determined from any initial conditions that might be provided. We can't form a "nice" equation in the form y=f(x) from this equation, but we've come far enough. :)
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
1) is non-linear, so is going to be messy. I'll have a look at 2) though.
The characteristic equation has roots ±i3, so yc=c1cos(3x)+c2sin(3x).
For the particular solution, letting yp=−32x will do the trick, and thus the general solution is
y=yc+yp=c1cos(3x)+c2sin(3x)−32x.
Log in to reply
sir can u provide me the steps, or any note on how to solve these, actually i only know how to solve homogeneous second order differential equation
Log in to reply
I'll provide you with a great link, just to save some time. The headings "Complex Roots" and "Nonhomogeneous DE's" are applicable for 2).
For 1) you could try the substitution v=dxdy. The equation then becomes
vdydv+e2yv3=0, which is still non-linear but is now first-order and may be easier to solve.
Log in to reply
(dxdy)3 on both the sides to get the equation of the form dy2d2x=−e2y which is then trivial.
For the first one of the terms on the other side and divide byLog in to reply
(dxdy)3dx2d2y=dy2d2x
sorry not understood, how isLog in to reply
(dydx)=(dxdy)−1. Then differentiate wrt y and apply chain rule on the other side to get the required answer.
It is simple. Start with⌣¨
thank you so much sir for the helpvdxdv+e2yv3=0
but sir shouldn't it beLog in to reply
dxdy=v we have, by way of the chain rule, that dx2d2y=dxdv=dydvdxdy=vdydv.
WithSo we've converted the original second-order DE with x as the independent variable into a first-order DE with y as the independent variable. We can simplify a bit further by eliminating v=0 as a solution, giving us
dydv+e2yv2=0, which is separable with solution v=e2y+C2.
So now we have that dxdy=e2y+C2, which again is separable with solution 2e2y+Cy=2x+K,
where constants C and K would be determined from any initial conditions that might be provided. We can't form a "nice" equation in the form y=f(x) from this equation, but we've come far enough. :)
@Brian Charlesworth sir, @Raghav Vaidyanathan ,@Shashwat Shukla
@Caleb Townsend @Ronak Agarwal @Otto Bretscher sir