Can anybody provide me a derivation for this Lemma ? I was able to prove this lemma by applying the principle of mathematical induction. However I believe there are variety of proofs and derivations for this lemma. It would be better if all the proofs and derivations are posted in this note. A BIG THANKS to contributors.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Well, use Binet's Formula. You will get it. It's easy. Binet's formula is fk=5ϕk−(1−ϕ)k
Log in to reply
I presume Binet's formula is derived from this lemma. Today when I asked my cousin about the derivation, he gave a resolved derivation which is understandable for almost everyone. First of all in this lemma GOLDEN RATIO is already given.
Golden ratio:x2=x+1
It is also given that n≥2
Now,x3=x2.x∴x3=(x+1).x....(x2=x+1)∴x3=x2+x∴x3=2x+1....(x2=x+1)
Similarly it can be proven that,
x4=3x+2x5=5x+3x6=8x+5
Thus we can conclude that xn=fnx+fn−1
We know the fact that the roots of golden ratio are ϕ and 1−ϕ
Now we can deduce two equations:
ϕn=fnϕ+fn−1....1)(1−ϕ)n=fn(1−ϕ)+fn−1....2)
Subtract equation 2 from 1 to yield Binet's formula
This was taught to me by my cousin. So, from above, I think Binet's formula was derived from this lemma.
Log in to reply
Yeah I thought of that too but I thought Binet's formula would have been better.
Log in to reply
Yes you can easily prove using binets formula
To prove the binets formula, i will give a hint
the nth fibonnaci (fn ) number is the coefficient of xn in
1−x−x21
now use partial fraction to break it down, you will know your answer as soon as you will do that
btw ϕ is one of the roots of the denominator of the infinite polynomial i gave
(note that the denominator is not the same quadratic as the one you gave, but the roots of this one and the one you gave are very common, you will see)
Log in to reply
Can you please elaborate.
can you please tell what fn stands for?
Log in to reply
Fn is the nth fibonacci number