In my last note, I went over the derivatives of xx and xxx. At the end, I went over a brief generalisation of differentiating nx: dxd(nx)=nx⋅dxd(n−1xlnx)
However, I am not satisfied with this because this is not fully calculated (you still need to differentiate n−1xlnx and so on). I want to have a nice expression for this.
Before we start picking apart this problem, I want to define a new function (unless it isn't new) because it may or may not be useful later. Let g(x)=f(x)(f(x)(f(x)(…(f(x)+t)+t)+t)…)+t
where f(x) is another function and k is some constant. There could be n many brackets here. For the purposes of this note, I want to notate this as g(x)=k=0Bnf(x)β+t
Here, β is where the nested brackets will go. Here is an example:
k=0B2aβ+b=a(a(a+b)+b)+b
Here is another:
k=3B6kβ−t=6(5(4(3−t)−t)−t)−t
Hopefully you understand what this function does. Anyway, onto the main topic of this note!
Let us be reminded of our starter last note: the derivative of xx. We found out that it was equal to xx(lnx+1) We also found out that the derivative of xxx was xxx+x−1(xln2(x)+xlnx+1) which can also be written as
xxx+x−1(xln(x)(ln(x)+1)+1)
For the sake of this note, I will not be calculating the derivative of xxxx by hand or any higher tetrations. If we look at the derivative of xxxx, it turns out to be
xxxx+xx−1(xxln(x)(xln(x)(ln(x)+1)+1)+1)
Maybe you start to see a pattern here. Just to check that there is one, we can observe the derivative of xxxxx:
xxxxx+xxx−1(xxxln(x)(xxln(x)(xln(x)(ln(x)+1)+1)+1)+1)
That's a lot of x's! However, in this giant mess, there is a pattern that begins to appear.
Can we try expressing these derivatives as the function that I established earlier? Let us do xxxx:
xxxx+xx−1(xxln(x)(xln(x)(ln(x)+1)+1)+1)=xxxx+xx−1k=0B2kxln(x)β+1
That's nice! Let's try with xxxxx:
xxxxx+xxx−1(xxxln(x)(xxln(x)(xln(x)(ln(x)+1)+1)+1)+1)=xxxxx+xxx−1k=0B3kxln(x)β+1
Apart from the first bit it looks extremely similar to the previous one! To generalise the first bit, we can express it as
xn−1x+n−2x−1
So finally, we can generalise the derivative of nx as
xn−1x+n−2x−1k=0Bn−2kxln(x)β+1 by using the new function.
I hope that this was not too confusing and that you may have learnt something!
(If you want the LATEX for the nested bracket function, it is \overset{\small \text{some other number}}{\underset{\small k=\text{ a number}}{\huge \Beta }} )
k= a numberBsome other number
#Calculus
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
There are no comments in this discussion.