This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
This solution was created using the Carroll-Dodson Condensation Method. Synthetic division in this case has no meaningful purpose. However, I will see what I can do as far as posting a better solution.
@Hero Miles
–
Why not just calculate the 3×3 determinant directly? The C-D method requires the calculation of five 2×2 determinants, when only three are necessary:
0=x(x2−10)−3(5x−20)+4(10−4x)=x3−41x+100
About the only short-cut to looking for the integer root of this cubic is to remember that any integer root n has to be a factor of 100. Testing ±1,±2,±4,±5,… we find n=4 quite quickly. We could trim the testing a little by observing that ∣x3−41x∣≤8+82=90<100 for ∣x∣≤2, and hence ∣n∣≥4. Thus we can start testing with n=±4, and hit paydirt first time. We might not have been so lucky, and it isn't really necessary. Testing on a predetermined finite set (the factors of 100) is not really trial and error.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Reduce to a 2×2 matrix: [10−4x12−2xx2−108−3x]=0
Then to a 1×1 matrix: (8−3x)(10−4x)−(12−2x)(x2−10)=0
Which then becomes x3−41x+100=0
Then after trial and error, x = 4 is one of the non-zero solutions
Log in to reply
Please see the edit now..And please could you give a solution other than hit and trial??Like using synthetic division??
Log in to reply
This solution was created using the Carroll-Dodson Condensation Method. Synthetic division in this case has no meaningful purpose. However, I will see what I can do as far as posting a better solution.
Log in to reply
3×3 determinant directly? The C-D method requires the calculation of five 2×2 determinants, when only three are necessary: 0=x(x2−10)−3(5x−20)+4(10−4x)=x3−41x+100 About the only short-cut to looking for the integer root of this cubic is to remember that any integer root n has to be a factor of 100. Testing ±1,±2,±4,±5,… we find n=4 quite quickly. We could trim the testing a little by observing that ∣x3−41x∣≤8+82=90<100 for ∣x∣≤2, and hence ∣n∣≥4. Thus we can start testing with n=±4, and hit paydirt first time. We might not have been so lucky, and it isn't really necessary. Testing on a predetermined finite set (the factors of 100) is not really trial and error.
Why not just calculate the