Let S be a surface of revolution in R3. Are the rotations about its axis all isometries of S?
Without loss of generality, let's assume that the axis of revolution is the z-axis, and the generating curve in the xz-plane is parametrised by a unit speed parametrised curve α:I→R3, where u∈I is α(u)=(f(u),0,g(u)). Then by rotating this planar curve in the z-axis, we have the parametrisation
φ(u,v)=(f(u)cosv,f(u)sinv,g(u)) of S.
The coefficients of the first fundamental form of this parametrisation are E=1,F=0,G=f2(u). Since we let the generating curve be parametrised by unit speed curve, φ does not depend on g. We can express the rotations by angle θ about the z-axis in the standard basis of R3:
Rz(θ)=⎣⎡cosθsinθ0−sinθcosθ0001⎦⎤
By composing this rotation with our parametrisation, we have φθ(u,v)=(Rz(θ)∘φ)(u,v)=(f(u)cos(v+θ), f(u)sin(v+θ), g(u)).
Hence the coefficients of the first fundamental form of the surface after rotation, φθ are
Eθ=⟨φθu,φθu⟩=(f′(u))2(cos2(v+θ)+sin2(v+θ))+(g′(u))2=(f′(u))2+(g′(u))2=1
Fθ=⟨φθu,φθv⟩=−(f′(u))2cos(v+θ)sin(v+θ)+(f′(u))2cos(v+θ)sin(v+θ)+0=0
Gθ=⟨φθv,φθv⟩=f2(u)sin2(v+θ)+f2(u)cos2(v+θ)=f2(u)
∴Eθ=1,Fθ=0,Gθ=f2(u).
Since Eθ=E,Fθ=F,Gθ=G, we see that the rotations of S about its axis by θ are local isometries to S.
#Geometry
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
There are no comments in this discussion.