Hi I started doing the "Calculus in a Nutshell" because even if I passed the exam at university I still have a lot of doubts about my understanding. So when I answered this question I had a new doubt. As you can see the Function since has x at denominator has to have a point of discontinuity for x=0. But since this function is equivalent to a straight line if I only see the straight line function I should have no discontinuity points. So my question is... If someone shows me a function like the one in the answer and ask me if there are discontinuity points and I answer that there are none I am wrong because I can lead back the function to the one with a denominator? Or it's just a matter of who was born first? The egg or the chicken?
I apologize for my bad English.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Is it possible to give down the function you had difficulties with? (You haven’t given the function in the note)
I posted a screenshot in the post but I'll write it down anyway the function is f(x)=x(x+a)2−a2 can be rewritten as f(x)=x+2a with x=0
Log in to reply
Oh sorry the screenshot didn't load for me even after I had read your question twice.
If someone were to show you the function f(x)=x+2a, you would certainly be correct in saying that there are no discontinuity points. However, if someone were to show you the function f(x)=x+2a, x=0, then you would not be able to give a correct answer. Whoever was showing you this function would be guilty of not giving you enough information. In other words, they would be asking you a question about all points on f(x), but not telling you what happens when x=0. So it would be impossible to give an answer. You could perhaps guess that there was a discontinuity point, since they told you that f(x) was only correct when x=0, which is "suspicious". But the only way to indicate that there is a discontinuity at x=0 is to give the full function, f(x)=x(a+x)2−a2 . Hope that helps!
Log in to reply
Yup it helped. Thank you very very much!
Log in to reply
No problem!