It is a common practice to move the around when solving ODE and we take for granted when we integrate both sides. However, I've been rather uncomfortable with this. From an analysis perspective, itself doesn't make sense to me. Instead, we always consider , or the operator by itself.
Like if we consider the example = . Here to solve this equation we take to right hand side and then integrate. But is considered as an operator.So why we treat it as a fraction in the above example .
Kindly explain me the process behind this or if there is any kind of theory.
If I mentioned something wrong (concept or anything), kindly also mention it.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
df(x):=△x→0lim[f(x+△x)−f(x)] Using this we can find that : dxdf(x)=lim△x→0[x+△x−x]lim△x→0[f(x+△x)−f(x)] =△x→0lim△xf(x+△x)−f(x)
I have always considered dx to be an infinitesimal and δx as an infinitesimal in a given direction, so moving them around always made sense to me.
Log in to reply
Can you please elaborate a bit? I am not getting you that much clearly.
Ok so my definition of dxdy in my head is always Δx➝0limΔxΔy➝0limΔy, so I can easily multiply dx anywhere I want without guilt, having this definition in mind
Log in to reply
In otherwords, I don’t see it as an operator, but an actual division\fraction of two numbers(they are not called numbers, but can be vaguely described in terms of them)
Log in to reply
Correct, I have the same concept in mind. "The symbol Δ refers to a finite variation or change of a quantity – by finite, I mean one that is not infinitely small. The symbols d,δ refer to infinitesimal variations or numerators and denominators of derivatives. "
Kindly look in my calculus notes. in chapter 2, it is mentioned that dy stands for change in y-coords as dy approaches 0, same for dx. Multiplying a fraction by its denominator is what we often do, right?
Log in to reply
So, having dxdy a fraction instead of an operator, things get easier :)
Thanks everyone these really helped! I was also thinking of a different approch. Like we consider some new Dx
And multiplying it to both sides like
dxdyDx = exDx
Now integrating both sides vanishes the operator .
If only we can get Dx in terms of dx ,
We are done!
Log in to reply
Why not you just putDx equal to dx
Log in to reply
I was just taking some arbitary Dx and tried to show it equal to dx.