Do we need to use complement to solve the (rain, earth quake, flu) problem

Why wouldn't we add the probabilities such that p(r U e U f) = p(r) + p(e) + p(f)

Isn't that the union rule for independent events? It produces a probability of 0.95 which is incorrect but I don't understand why.

Thank you Warren Roberts

Note by Warren Roberts
2 years, 2 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

I believe you're referring to this problem.

No, you're wrong. It should be  Probability of at least one of them happening = 100% - Probability of none of them happening \text{ Probability of at least one of them happening = 100\% - Probability of none of them happening} as shown in the solution.

Why? Let's suppose you replace the numbers 30%, 20%, 45% in the problem statement with 70%, 80%, 90%, respectively. Will the answer turn out to be 70% + 80% + 90% = 240%? That's absurd!

But why is it wrong? Referring to the formula here, we have P(HEF)=P(H)+P(E)+P(F)P(HE)P(HF)P(EF)+P(HEF). P(H\cap E\cap F) = P(H)+P(E)+P(F)-P(H\cap E)-P(H\cap F)-P(E\cap F)+P(H\cap E\cap F).

Since they are mutually independent events, we have P(HE)=P(H)×P(E),P(HF)=P(H)×P(F),P(EF)=P(E)×P(F),P(HEF)=P(H)×P(E)×P(F) P(H\cap E) = P(H) \times P(E) , P(H\cap F) = P(H) \times P(F) , P(E \cap F) = P(E) \times P(F) , P(H \cap E \cap F) = P(H) \times P(E) \times P(F) .

So, without using complementary probability, the answer will still be the same: P(HEF)=30%+20%+45%30%×20%30%×45%20%×45%+30%×20%×45%=69.2%69% P(H\cap E\cap F) = 30\% + 20\% + 45\% - 30\% \times 20\% - 30\% \times 45\% - 20\% \times 45\% + 30\% \times 20\% \times 45\% = 69.2\% \approx \boxed{69\%}

Pi Han Goh - 2 years, 2 months ago

Tha really helps. Thank you

Warren Roberts - 2 years, 2 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...