Doubt in calculus limit problem

Determine limnxn\displaystyle{\lim_{n\to\infty} x_n} if (1+1n)n+xn=e\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{n+x_n}=e

I have typed 2 methods giving two different answers


Method 1

limn(1+1n)n+xn=limne    limn(1+1n)nlimn(1+1n)xn=e    elimn(1+1n)xn=e    limn(1+1n)xn=1\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{n+x_n}=\lim_{n\to\infty}e\\\implies \lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{n}\cdot\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{x_n}=e\\\implies e\cdot\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{x_n}=e \\\implies \lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{x_n}=1 Also as xnx_n was finite (1)finite=1(\to 1) ^ {finite} = 1 and thus xnx_n cannot be determined.

method 2

Take log both sides and get (xn+n)ln(1+1n)=1\left(x_n+n\right)\ln\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)=1 Also as t=1n;n;t0t=\frac{1}{n};n\to\infty;t\to0 Now xn=1ln(1+t)1t=tln(1+t)t2(ln(1+t)t)x_n=\frac{1}{\ln\left(1+t\right)}-\frac{1}{t}=\frac{t-\ln\left(1+t\right)}{t^2\left(\frac{\ln\left(1+t\right)}{t}\right)} limnxn=limt0tln(1+t)t2(ln(1+t)t)=limt0tln(1+t)t2limt01ln(1+t)t=121\lim_{n\to\infty}x_n=\lim_{t\to0}\frac{t-\ln\left(1+t\right)}{t^2\left(\frac{\ln\left(1+t\right)}{t}\right)}=\lim_{t\to0}\frac{t-\ln\left(1+t\right)}{t^2}\cdot\lim_{t\to0}\frac{1}{\frac{\ln\left(1+t\right)}{t}}=\frac{1}{2}\cdot1 (Used certain standard limits which you can solve by series or wikipedia for more methods.)


Please help.

(By the way I typed the note in Mathquill. Really nice to use)

#Calculus #Limits

Note by Megh Parikh
7 years ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

I remember setting this question before - The Limit Of The Exponents.

The issue with your first method is that when you took limits in the first step, you increased the solution space of xnx_n from being an exact value, to being a much larger set. This is why you reach the conclusion that xnx_n cannot be determined. As you denoted, you only have forward implication signs, but not backward implication.

Note: It is true that if the limit of YnY_n is 12 \frac{1}{2} (or any other constant), then the limit of (1+1n)Yn=1 \left( 1 + \frac{1}{n} \right) ^{Y_n} =1 .

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

I don't understand what you want to say. Can you please explain in more simple English and less higher math jargon?

Megh Parikh - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

The simple english version is that your implications only work one way (as indicated by your forward arrows). Hence, the given condition implies your final conclusion, but not necessarily the other way around.

As an example, what you did was equivalent to saying that

x=1x2=1x21=0(x1)(x+1)+0x=1 or 1. x = 1 \Rightarrow x ^2 = 1 \Rightarrow x^2 - 1 = 0 \Rightarrow (x-1)(x+1) + 0 \Rightarrow x = 1 \text{ or }-1.

and claiming that x=1 x = -1 is a solution to the original equation. This is not true, because the implications only work one way. We only have x=1x=1 or 1 x = 1 \Rightarrow x = 1 \text{ or } -1 but we do not have x=1 or 1x=1 x = 1 \text{ or } -1 \Rightarrow x = 1 .

You can see how in the first implication, you increased the solution space from 1 element, to 2 elements.

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin Can you perhaps state how solution space is increased or share a note stating steps which we muust not take otherwise increased solution space?

Megh Parikh - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

@Megh Parikh Simply put, if you do not prove that your implications work both ways, then it need not be true that the implications work both ways.

Whenever you manipulate equations (or inequalities), you need to be acutely aware of that.

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin Yes I understood thanks

Megh Parikh - 7 years ago

It's true that xnx_n can be any constant, there is no problem with that.

Bogdan Simeonov - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

That's no true. Youu can use series expansion to get the answer as 12\frac{1}{2}. Also I know another method to get this answer. Please wait for me to type it out today night.

Megh Parikh - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

Calvin says that it can be any other finite constant, so it is :D.

Bogdan Simeonov - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

@Bogdan Simeonov I did not say that "the limit of xnx_n (as defined in the question) is any finite constant".

I said that IF the limit of YnY_n (which is not the same as the sequence defined in the question) is any finite constant, then the limit of (1+1n)Yn (1 + \frac{1}{n} ) ^{ Y_n} is 1.

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin Oh...but then any fixed constant will work, won't it?

Bogdan Simeonov - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

@Bogdan Simeonov No. xnx_n is defined in a very unique way in the question.

It is likely that you are confused because I used the same variable throughout. Let me make an edit.

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin Ah, I checked the problem and now I understand.

Bogdan Simeonov - 7 years ago

@Calvin Lin Well limxaf(x)g(x)=limxaf(x)limxag(x)\displaystyle{\lim_{x\to a} f(x) ^{g(x)} = \lim{x\to a} f(x)^{\lim{x\to a} g(x)} } and so wont we get limnxn=anything\lim_{n\to\infty} x_n =anything

Megh Parikh - 7 years ago

Log in to reply

@Megh Parikh Very very false. You will get issues if these sequences approach 0 or \infty . Look through the proofs, and see why these edges cases are important.

See for example They told me that 00=10^0 = 1 , but why? .

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years ago

@Bogdan Simeonov Now see the Method 2 in the note

Megh Parikh - 7 years ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...