Determine n→∞limxn if (1+n1)n+xn=e
I have typed 2 methods giving two different answers
Method 1
n→∞lim(1+n1)n+xn=n→∞lime⟹n→∞lim(1+n1)n⋅n→∞lim(1+n1)xn=e⟹e⋅n→∞lim(1+n1)xn=e⟹n→∞lim(1+n1)xn=1
Also as xn was finite
(→1)finite=1 and thus xn cannot be determined.
method 2
Take log both sides and get
(xn+n)ln(1+n1)=1
Also as t=n1;n→∞;t→0
Now xn=ln(1+t)1−t1=t2(tln(1+t))t−ln(1+t)
n→∞limxn=t→0limt2(tln(1+t))t−ln(1+t)=t→0limt2t−ln(1+t)⋅t→0limtln(1+t)1=21⋅1
(Used certain standard limits which you can solve by series or wikipedia for more methods.)
Please help.
(By the way I typed the note in Mathquill. Really nice to use)
#Calculus
#Limits
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I remember setting this question before - The Limit Of The Exponents.
The issue with your first method is that when you took limits in the first step, you increased the solution space of xn from being an exact value, to being a much larger set. This is why you reach the conclusion that xn cannot be determined. As you denoted, you only have forward implication signs, but not backward implication.
Note: It is true that if the limit of Yn is 21 (or any other constant), then the limit of (1+n1)Yn=1.
Log in to reply
I don't understand what you want to say. Can you please explain in more simple English and less higher math jargon?
Log in to reply
The simple english version is that your implications only work one way (as indicated by your forward arrows). Hence, the given condition implies your final conclusion, but not necessarily the other way around.
As an example, what you did was equivalent to saying that
x=1⇒x2=1⇒x2−1=0⇒(x−1)(x+1)+0⇒x=1 or −1.
and claiming that x=−1 is a solution to the original equation. This is not true, because the implications only work one way. We only have x=1⇒x=1 or −1 but we do not have x=1 or −1⇒x=1.
You can see how in the first implication, you increased the solution space from 1 element, to 2 elements.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Whenever you manipulate equations (or inequalities), you need to be acutely aware of that.
Log in to reply
It's true that xn can be any constant, there is no problem with that.
Log in to reply
That's no true. Youu can use series expansion to get the answer as 21. Also I know another method to get this answer. Please wait for me to type it out today night.
Log in to reply
Calvin says that it can be any other finite constant, so it is :D.
Log in to reply
xn (as defined in the question) is any finite constant".
I did not say that "the limit ofI said that IF the limit of Yn (which is not the same as the sequence defined in the question) is any finite constant, then the limit of (1+n1)Yn is 1.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
xn is defined in a very unique way in the question.
No.It is likely that you are confused because I used the same variable throughout. Let me make an edit.
Log in to reply
x→alimf(x)g(x)=limx→af(x)limx→ag(x) and so wont we get limn→∞xn=anything
WellLog in to reply
∞. Look through the proofs, and see why these edges cases are important.
Very very false. You will get issues if these sequences approach 0 orSee for example They told me that 00=1, but why? .
@Bogdan Simeonov Now see the Method 2 in the note