This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
I mean I've seen these articles where they say "Any/all of your numerical passwords, everyone's birthday, blah blah blah are contained within pi" or something like that. This may be an obvious question, but where's the limit on length of a sequence of digits that can fit into pi?
Digits of pi in e = 2.7182818284590452353602874713526624977572470936999595749669676277240766303535475945713821785251664274274663919320030599218174136
Digits of e in pi =
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081056239
I meant seeing 314159265358979323846...somewhere in e eventually. Without skipping digits. Because the way you did it, of course you could fit all the digits eventually lol
@Agnishom Chattopadhyay
–
ah! interesting...why does x have to be rational? It could be the sum of two irrationals, right? And since π has infinite digits, will your rational number have decimals? Because you have to then avoid modifying the π portion and maybe have a.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111...0000000000000000000000000 just as an example. I could be wrong because I haven't slept much...lol
@Agnishom Chattopadhyay
–
but nonetheless, that is interesting! Would it be okay if π were at the end of e? Because both are irrational. Would it matter?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
This reminds me of Banach–Tarski paradox.
Reshared!
Not necesary, I think, is like saying that the secuence of digits of e is a subset of the secuence of digits of π
Log in to reply
I mean I've seen these articles where they say "Any/all of your numerical passwords, everyone's birthday, blah blah blah are contained within pi" or something like that. This may be an obvious question, but where's the limit on length of a sequence of digits that can fit into pi?
Yes! I'll give a constructive argument in a few minutes
Log in to reply
...
Digits of pi in e = 2.7182818284590452353602874713526624977572470936999595749669676277240766303535475945713821785251664274274663919320030599218174136
Digits of e in pi = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081056239
Log in to reply
I meant seeing 314159265358979323846...somewhere in e eventually. Without skipping digits. Because the way you did it, of course you could fit all the digits eventually lol
Log in to reply
e=x+10−iπ
where x is a rational number and i is an integer. I do not think this is true. Although, I cannot prove it.
Log in to reply
π has infinite digits, will your rational number have decimals? Because you have to then avoid modifying the π portion and maybe have a.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111...0000000000000000000000000 just as an example. I could be wrong because I haven't slept much...lol
ah! interesting...why does x have to be rational? It could be the sum of two irrationals, right? And sinceLog in to reply
In this case, x= 2.728 is the rational part
Log in to reply
π at the end of e? That doesn't make much sense
so you're talking about puttingLog in to reply
e because e doesn't end
because it could just be somewhere in the "middle" ofLog in to reply
π is irrational and hence doesn't have a terminating decimal expansion; how can it be in the middle of e?
π were at the end of e? Because both are irrational. Would it matter?
but nonetheless, that is interesting! Would it be okay ifA note: Only one of them can be true. I shall prove it, by Contradiction.
Let e have a digits and π have b digits.
Then, a≤b≤a.
Since a=a, a=b.
a = b implies that π=e.
Contradiction.
Log in to reply
No, both numbers are irrational and they don't terminate, so you can't say that e have a digits and π have b digits.