This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
I hope I can make myself expressible.
p and q are twin primes, that is, they differ by 2. Let r be the only positive integer between p and q. Then prq, being a product of 3 consecutive integers, is divisible by 3. Since p and q are primes, 3 divides r, and hence, p=3m+2 and q=3n+1, where m and n are positive integers.
Their product, thus, is of the form 3l+2, where l is a positive integer. Lastly, 10k=(9+1)k is of the form 3o+1, where o is a positive integer.
Adding them together, pq+10k is of the form 3l+2+3o+1, which is of the form 3z, where z is a positive integer.
This is divisible by 3, thus this cannot be a prime number.
The first part can also be proved using the fact that all primes ≥5 are of the form 6k+1 or 6k+5, where k is a positive integer. Anyway, nice solution :)
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I hope I can make myself expressible.
p and q are twin primes, that is, they differ by 2. Let r be the only positive integer between p and q. Then prq, being a product of 3 consecutive integers, is divisible by 3. Since p and q are primes, 3 divides r, and hence, p=3m+2 and q=3n+1, where m and n are positive integers.
Their product, thus, is of the form 3l+2, where l is a positive integer. Lastly, 10k=(9+1)k is of the form 3o+1, where o is a positive integer.
Adding them together, pq+10k is of the form 3l+2+3o+1, which is of the form 3z, where z is a positive integer.
This is divisible by 3, thus this cannot be a prime number.
Log in to reply
The first part can also be proved using the fact that all primes ≥5 are of the form 6k+1 or 6k+5, where k is a positive integer. Anyway, nice solution :)
Log in to reply
Yeah! Thanks, I just wanted to use simple divisibility rules, the hint Sharky gave.
nice one, but I think that p=3m−1 and q=3m+1 since you say they are twins
Log in to reply
Note that this doesn't hold for p=3,q=5.
This case has to be dealt with separately. (obvious fix).
The error in the initial logic is making the wrong assumption that 3∣pqr→3∣r.
Good one!!! @Satvik Golechha and @Sharky Kesa
Log in to reply
Thanks! Gave RMO?
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Big hint: Consider the equation modulo 3.