"Consider triangle ABC. Point D is on AC, E is on BC and F is on AB. Given that triangle DEF is equilateral and that segments CD, BE and AF are equal in length, prove that triangle ABC must also be equilateral."
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Here's one way of looking at this problem. Consider this graphic
If two circles of unequal radius share two points, then the angle subtended by those points and the center of the smaller circle is always greater than the angle subtended by same and any point on the larger circle. Now consider any equilateral triangle, and draw in three equal circles centered at its vertices. Then, given a point on any circle, draw a line through it and the center of the "next" circle, and extend it until it intersects it at a new point. Given a range of points on the first circle, the range of new points on the next will always be less. Repeat process from "next" circle to the next, with the result that the range of new points converges to a single point at all three circles. Since there will always exist an equilateral triangle that meets the conditions, there can be no other kind of triangle in which this process will converge to, as it would imply more than one limiting case.
Maybe later I'll post a graphic of this process with a fuller explanation.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Note: You will need the points to lie on the segments, instead of the (extended) line. Otherwise, this statement is not true.
Here's one way of looking at this problem. Consider this graphic
If two circles of unequal radius share two points, then the angle subtended by those points and the center of the smaller circle is always greater than the angle subtended by same and any point on the larger circle. Now consider any equilateral triangle, and draw in three equal circles centered at its vertices. Then, given a point on any circle, draw a line through it and the center of the "next" circle, and extend it until it intersects it at a new point. Given a range of points on the first circle, the range of new points on the next will always be less. Repeat process from "next" circle to the next, with the result that the range of new points converges to a single point at all three circles. Since there will always exist an equilateral triangle that meets the conditions, there can be no other kind of triangle in which this process will converge to, as it would imply more than one limiting case.
Maybe later I'll post a graphic of this process with a fuller explanation.