We know that eiπ=−1e^{i\pi} = -1 eiπ=−1. So, ln(−1)=iπ\ln(-1) = i\pi ln(−1)=iπ. Well, ln(1)=0\ln(1) = 0ln(1)=0. So, I guess we can write ln(−1)+ln(−1)=ln(−1⋅−1)=ln(1)=0\ln(-1) + \ln(-1) = \ln(-1\cdot -1) = \ln(1) = 0ln(−1)+ln(−1)=ln(−1⋅−1)=ln(1)=0. But ln(−1)+ln(−1)=iπ+iπ=2iπ\ln(-1) + \ln(-1) = i\pi + i\pi = 2i\pi ln(−1)+ln(−1)=iπ+iπ=2iπ
What's the falacy?
Note by Gabriel Laurentino 7 years ago
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
_italics_
**bold**
__bold__
- bulleted- list
1. numbered2. list
paragraph 1paragraph 2
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
This is a quote
# I indented these lines # 4 spaces, and now they show # up as a code block. print "hello world"
\(
\)
\[
\]
2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
the identity you used is applicable for numbers belonging to the set (0,infinity) only
May be because the properties of ln is applicable only for numbers within its domain..
Log in to reply
I thought the same. Thanks!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
the identity you used is applicable for numbers belonging to the set (0,infinity) only
May be because the properties of ln is applicable only for numbers within its domain..
Log in to reply
I thought the same. Thanks!