Just wanted to know whether Euler was correct in assuming the laws of a finite polynomial to hold true even for an infinite polynomial when he working was on the infinite sum
1+1/4+1/9+1/16 .........
Or in other words is Euler justified in expanding an infinite polynomial into product of infinite roots as he did with the sin x/x case
And is he justified in equating the co-efficientls of infinite polynomials.as far as I have seen funny things happen when we apply rules of finite series to infinite series.
So is the proof that Euler gave us rigorous or is there a more rigorous proof.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
There's a more rigorous proof involving Fourier series.