This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Well, general solution and a method of solving... Is there one? Like, you know, ax2+bx+c=0⇒x=2a−b±b2−4ac, and so on. Does this form of equations have a general solution? If not, that's ok. Just a solution to 2x−3x/2−1=0 would be fine too.
Can this even be done? Are equations in form ax+bx/2+c=0 solvable? Seems tempting to complete the square, until we realize it doesn't work like that on exponentials.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Do you mean finding a general solution in terms of functions?(logarithms for example) or just approximating and finding number of solutions????
Log in to reply
Well, general solution and a method of solving... Is there one? Like, you know, ax2+bx+c=0⇒x=2a−b±b2−4ac, and so on. Does this form of equations have a general solution? If not, that's ok. Just a solution to 2x−3x/2−1=0 would be fine too.
Thanks
A non-rigorous proof would be to note how
2x−3x/2
grows larger and larger as x increases. A quick table would quickly confirm. If we let y=2x−3x/2, we have:
(2,1),
(4,5),
(6,37),
(8,175),
and so on and so forth.
Log in to reply
Not seeking for a proof here, but an analytical solution. What if we had instead
2.71828x−6.67384x/2−360=0?
Try making tables now.
Can this even be done? Are equations in form ax+bx/2+c=0 solvable? Seems tempting to complete the square, until we realize it doesn't work like that on exponentials.
Oh, maths.
Thanks, Finn.