This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Sorry i am weak at maths,please tell me Then since 2^192 is a perfect square, and every term is greater than 2^192 , dividing by yields.......why you only divide the whole term by 2^192...........? and why divide only.....
please help me friends.....
Your blog is awesome,why do you stop writing it,please if you get some good questions,then please send it to me...by the way, how did you become so good in maths.....please share it with me pleaseeeee
Zi Song, that's correct, albeit extremely lengthy. Can you shorten it to just a few lines? I believe that you all you need is 225×2192+2n=k2, and that there is a unique solution (a,b) to 2a−2b=c, for any integer c. You explicitly used the first idea, and implicitly used the second idea in "By considering all cases ...".
@Samuel, the reason is because you entered the brackets as \ [ code \ ], instead of \ ( code \ ) . The former will make each equation into a line, the latter will make each equation part of your sentence. If you look at the math formatting guide, all of the brackets are \ ( \ ). This is similar to the difference between $ $ code $ $, and $ code $ in other Latex compilers. (spaces suitably removed).
So since it's not specified that the solution has to be an integer, I came up with this:
[note: let me apologize ahead of time for the formatting of this comment. For some reason the LATEX processor on Brilliant is giving all of my math a new line (as above).]
2200−31×2192+2n=2184(216−31×28+2n−184)
Letting a=28 we have
2184(a2−31×a+2n−184)
Since 2^184 is a perfect square, all we need to show is that a2−31×a+2n−184 is a square. However, note that it does not need to be the square of an integer; it suffices to be an integer divided by an even power of 2 less than or equal to 184 (I know this is wordy. Don't think about it too much now because it will make sense in context later.)
We now use the identity that (a−c)2=a2−2ac+c2. Therefore when 2n−184=(231)2, our quantity is a square. Now, we only need to solve a one-variable equation:
This makes 216−31⋅28+2n−184=4231361
Alas! We've made the square of 28−231=2481 which is not an integer! But wait! We get lucky! When multiplying it by 2^184, it corrects, and we get an integer with an integral square root!
And indeed, according to my calculator 2200−31×2192+2n for n=log2931+182 is equal to 1190898317792535824452957503488, an integer!!!!! Thus, we are done.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
n = 198
Here is the full solution to this problem.
i) if n=192,
Then we have 2192(226), which is clearly not a perfect square.
ii) if n>192,
Then since 2192 is a perfect square, and every term is greater than 2192, dividing by 2192 yields
225+2n−192, which must also be a perfect square.
Let 225+2n−192=k2,
Then 2n−192=(k+15)(k−15).
Note that both factors must be powers of two and their difference is 30.
Note that 26−25=25>30, so both factors must be less than 26
By considering all cases, we get only 30=25−21 works.
And so we get k+15=32,k−15=2, so 2n−192=32⋅2=26 and thus n=198.
iii) if n<192
2200−31⋅2192+2n=2n(2200−n−31⋅2192−n+1)
Note that the factor in the bracket is odd
And so if n is odd, then 2n is not a perfect square and so the factor in the bracket must be even, contradiction.
So n is even.
Then 2n is a perfect square.
So 2200−n−31⋅2192−n+1 is a perfect square.
2200−n−31⋅2192−n+1=(2192−n(152))+1
Since n is even, 192−n is also even.
So 2192−n is a perfect square.
And so 2200−n−31⋅2192−n+1 is not a perfect square since it is one more than a perfect square.
Note : 2192−n=0
So n=198 is the only solution to the problem
friends i hope the answer would be 196...is it correct,i dont have its answer.....
You are saying n=196 then it that case
2192(28−31+24) since 2192 is a square , 256−31+16 should be s square but since it is not a perfect square , this means that n=196 is not the answer :
now consider three cases : n>192,n=192,n<192 and do case chase you will land up with
n=198 is the only solution
Naishad P. - n=198 is indeed correct. Because 2192(28−31+26)=2192⋅172 is a perfect square.
Sorry i am weak at maths,please tell me Then since 2^192 is a perfect square, and every term is greater than 2^192 , dividing by yields.......why you only divide the whole term by 2^192...........? and why divide only..... please help me friends.....
HELLO SHivang ,thank you for answer,i visited your blog,its excellent,i forgot its address .please give me your blog URL....PLEASEEEEEEEEEE
I have stopped writing it now :( link : www.advancemaths.wordpress.com
But however i think Brilliant scholars blog is much much better than any blog ! So recommend you to read posts from brilliant scholars blog.
Your blog is awesome,why do you stop writing it,please if you get some good questions,then please send it to me...by the way, how did you become so good in maths.....please share it with me pleaseeeee
Zi Song, that's correct, albeit extremely lengthy. Can you shorten it to just a few lines? I believe that you all you need is 225×2192+2n=k2, and that there is a unique solution (a,b) to 2a−2b=c, for any integer c. You explicitly used the first idea, and implicitly used the second idea in "By considering all cases ...".
@Samuel, the reason is because you entered the brackets as \ [ code \ ], instead of \ ( code \ ) . The former will make each equation into a line, the latter will make each equation part of your sentence. If you look at the math formatting guide, all of the brackets are \ ( \ ). This is similar to the difference between $ $ code $ $, and $ code $ in other Latex compilers. (spaces suitably removed).
So since it's not specified that the solution has to be an integer, I came up with this:
[note: let me apologize ahead of time for the formatting of this comment. For some reason the LATEX processor on Brilliant is giving all of my math a new line (as above).]
2200−31×2192+2n= 2184(216−31×28+2n−184)
Letting a=28 we have
2184(a2−31×a+2n−184)
Since 2^184 is a perfect square, all we need to show is that a2−31×a+2n−184 is a square. However, note that it does not need to be the square of an integer; it suffices to be an integer divided by an even power of 2 less than or equal to 184 (I know this is wordy. Don't think about it too much now because it will make sense in context later.)
We now use the identity that (a−c)2=a2−2ac+c2. Therefore when 2n−184=(231)2, our quantity is a square. Now, we only need to solve a one-variable equation:
2n−184=(231)2 222n−184=931 2n−182=931 n−182=log2931 n=log2931+182
This makes 216−31⋅28+2n−184=4231361 Alas! We've made the square of 28−231=2481 which is not an integer! But wait! We get lucky! When multiplying it by 2^184, it corrects, and we get an integer with an integral square root!
And indeed, according to my calculator 2200−31×2192+2n for n=log2931+182 is equal to 1190898317792535824452957503488, an integer!!!!! Thus, we are done.