We have to find the acceleration of the blocks in the above picture considering all the surfaces to be smooth and tension is in string is uniform.
Since, in the horizontal direction, there is no force, that implies that the block of mass does not have any acceleration.
Therefore .
Now, if the blocks of mass and are moving with an acceleration relative to the bigger block (of mass ) .
Now, we can write the force equations for the smaller blocks, that is and .
Solving this, we get . However, the answer given to the above problem is as well, that is , whole system is at rest. Is my method wrong or the given answer is wrong?
Another similar problem that is bothering me is this:
Now, here similar to the previous problem I have assumed that the bigger block of mass moves towards right and the smaller blocks move with an acceleration relative to the bigger bloc towards left.
Again in horizontal direction, net force is so I wrote but the given answer in this case is and . Now my very first equation becomes wrong due to this. Where is the fault?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Acceleration is a=3g as you claim. Maybe both blocks have equal mass m or the answer given is wrong. :)
Log in to reply
No, the blocks aren't of equal mass. I have one more similar problem, and again my answer does not match with the given answer. Give it a try too, I will upload it too.
Log in to reply
Ok, I'll give it a try. Do mention me there so that I'll get notified. :)
Log in to reply
Log in to reply