Given arbitrary points , can we construct (only using compass and straightedge) an equilateral triangle such that lie on the sides of ?
Yes, we can! Try it for yourself before reading on.
We use the following sequence of steps:
Draw a arbitrary line from point not touching point and
Take an arbitrary point on the line and draw another line from till such that (see how to draw with compass here)
Join and
Extend a line from till such that (see how to draw)
Extend intersecting at
As in step draw angle
As in step join and
As in step Draw line
Extend and and let them intersect at
Now points and lie on the sides of the equilateral triangle
Justification:
After step As from step Similarly we can prove that From angle sum property of triangle From and it is proved that is an equilateral triangle
Now a bonus : Given arbitrary points and can you draw a square such that points and lies on the sides - A problem given by Jeff Giff
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
@Jeff Giff - I didn't write my construction for rectangle (it will take more time and lines which I don't have this time! )
@Yajat Shamji, @Kumudesh Ghosh, @Kriti Kamal, @Aryan Sanghi, @Vinayak Srivastava, @Mahdi Raza, @Alak Bhattacharya, @Marvin Kalngan
Log in to reply
Hyper-Brilliant!
@Zakir HusainAre you allowed to extend a side of the square beyond the segment between the vertices? If not, then if A,B,C are the vertices of an equilateral triangle and D is the centre of the triangle, no square can be constructed.
Log in to reply
@Justin Travers - If A,B,C and D forms a concave quadrilateral then no rectangle can be constructed, and as a square is a rectangle also therefore if A,B,C and D forms a concave quadrilateral then the square we desired is not possible. Therefore A,B,C and D must form a convex quadrilateral together.
Log in to reply
@Zakir Husain Yes,for concave quadrilateral no rectangle can be drawn.Can you recommend me some books for geometry??Thanks in advance
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
I will try to give a method of the Bonus Question, though I think it can be simplfied.
Construct circles with diameter AC, BD, and call them ωA, ωB, respectively.
Construct circles with the same radius r centered at A and B, call them OA,OB, respectively.
The radical axes of OA and ωA is LA, and define LB similarly.
Construct a circle with diameter AB, call it Ω, and its center M.
Choose K on Ω such that KA=KB.
KA intersects LA at E, F is on KM such that FE⊥EK.
The circle with diameter KF intersects LA at point G other than E.
H is on LB such that HG⊥GE, and BH intersect Ω at a point I other than B.
Reflect I about M and we get Q.
Log in to reply
About what radius r do you mean in the second step?
Log in to reply
You can choose any length to be the radius, just make sure the two circles are the same size.
Can you also give a justification or proof that how these steps work so that the answer becomes mathematically acceptable
Log in to reply
I used inversion, Steiner Conic, and spiral similarity to come up with this. I will try to figure out if there is a simpler proof for this construction.
Second attempt:) (Much simpler)
Call the circle with diameter AB Ω. Choose K on Ω such that KA=KB.
AC intersect Ω at point E other than A, and construct the circumcircle of CEK, call it ω.
ω intersects the circle with diameter CD at a point other than C, which is the desired S.
Log in to reply
There are two choices of K, so there are two squares that satisfies the condition.
Can you please give a proof or justification also for your steps of construction?
Log in to reply
I will give an idea of how I come up with this construction.
First of all, let the foot of A, B on RS, SP be A′, B′, respectively.
We know that A′,B′ lie on the circle with diameter AC,BD, respectively.
Also, we have AA′=BB′, and AA′⊥BB′, thus the intersection of AA′ and BB′ lies on Ω.
We now know that the Miquel point(K) of complete quadrilateral AA′B′B is on Ω, and since AA′=BB′, we have KA=KB (thus the location of K), and KA′=KB′.
Hence the goal is to find two points A′,B′, which lie on the circle with diameter AC,BD, respectively, and satisfies KA′=KB′ and KA′⊥KB′.
So actually B′ is the point obtained by rotating A′ around K for 90∘, hence we rotate all the possible location of A′, which is the circle with diameter AC, around K for 90∘.
Let C′ be the point obtained by rotating C around K for 90∘, then the circle we obtained on the previous step has diameter BC′, so B′ lies on both the circle with diameter BC′ and the circle with diameter BD.
So it is the matter of how to find C′. Since the Miquel point of ACC′B is also K, the intersection of AC and BC′ lies on Ω, which is E.
According to the above, C′ lies on the circumcircle of CEK(ω). Also CC′ is the diameter of ω since ∠CKC′ is a right angle.
Since B′ lies on both the circle with diameter BC′ and the circle with diameter BD, BB′ is the radical axes of the two circles, so BB′ is perpendicular to C′D.
Also, SC//BB′, so SC⊥C′D. We have CS⊥DS, so C′,D,S are collinear, hence ∠CSD=∠CSC′=90∘, which leads to S lying on ω.
We have that S lies on ω, and also S lies on the circle of diameter CD, hence the construction.
Log in to reply