Even when x = 0?
I'm learning how to get the asymptote of a rational function and I was curious about the function:
It only has one vertical asymptote. I understand that the expression can be simplified, but when «x = a» the expression (without simplifying) it remains:
Which is not defined.
But with the simplification yes, it is defined.
I would like to know who to believe. I would like to know where I am wrong.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Whenever you simplify the same term from the top and bottom, you write the condition that this term should not be equal to 0. Hence, when you simplify (x−a)(x−b)(x−a), you also write x−a=0⟹x=a.
So, this rational function is never defined when x=a, so it will be undefined at that point and as pointed by Krishna, it will have a hole. Also, this function will be discontinuous
0/0 is never 1. I understand your logic, but it's best to think of such a definition as nonsensical. So x/x is not always 1. So when you represent it on a graph, it is a function with a little hole at x = 0 because x cannot be equal to zero.
Log in to reply
thanks, i understood perfectly
Log in to reply
No problem mate. Have a good day.