Continued from this note.
So far, we've talked about gambling in a setting where you've decided on a threshold for when to stop, in terms of a target gain. (And of course you stop if you are ruined.)
But now, what happens if we don't have to worry about death and taxes? (What a wonderful world!) Can you just keep gambling forever?
82% of people got this right.
You walk into Martin Gale's Betting Room with an initial budget of
As usual, you can play the following game any number of times (if you still have what it costs)
Your plan is to just keep playing indefinitely, if you can.
Which of the following is true?
1) You will lose all your money within games.
2) You will lose all your money within games.
3) There is an integer such that it is impossible to increase your wealth to
4) For each integer , you have a positive probability of increasing your wealth to , hence you have a positive probability of being able to play indefinitely.
5) For each integer , you have a positive probability of increasing your wealth to , but you will inevitably eventually lose all your money.
Note: You may assume that Martin's budget is infinite. In fact this is implicit in the fact that you are even allowed, in principle, to play indefinitely. If Martin had a finite budget then situation would be equivalent to your deciding to play up to threshold .
SPOILERS AHEAD
.
.
.
.
.
We already know from the previous problems that if you fix any , then the probability that you increase your wealth to is . Nevertheless, you cannot keep gambling indefinitely. Here is why. Let us imagine an infinite sequence of games that you are planning to play, and we will group them into batches using what is called a "doubling trick" as follows. The first batch is all the games until you either lose all your money or increase it to , whichever comes first. Then, as we have already seen, you have probability 1/2 of reaching and probability 1/2 of ruin. If you are still around after the first batch, then your new budget is and the second batch is all the games until you either lose all your money or increase it to , whichever comes first. Again, you have probability 1/2 of emerging from the second batch "unruined", with a new budget of . Inductively, the th batch of games starts out with a budget of and continues till it has either ruined you (with probability 1/2) or increased your budget to . We have effectively reduced the problem to a sequence of fair coin flips, Heads you're ruined, Tails you get to try again. But now it is pretty clear that the probability of an infinite sequence of Tails is zero, so you inevitably eventually roll Heads and lose all your money.
So how long do you expect to play before you go bust?
35% of people got this right.
You walk into Martin Gale's Betting Room with an initial budget of
Again, you can play the following game any number of times (if you have what it costs)
You decide to keep playing, meaning that the only thing that will cause you to stop is losing all your money. How many games do you expect to play before you stop?
Note: As in problem 6 of this series, you may assume Martin's budget is infinite.
SPOILERS AHEAD
.
.
.
.
.
And now this is the confounding part! The expected time until you stop is infinite. How can we see this?
We will subdivide the games into batches as before. Let be the number of games player in the th batch of games. If you do not survive until the th batch, then . Let be the total number of games played. Then, by Linearity of Expectation, the expected number of games played is the sum of the expectations of the s. Recall that the th batch of games goes from a budget of until your wealth is doubled or you are ruined. To have made it to this batch at all, you have to first have survived the previous batches, which we showed was equivalent to favorable coin flips, and happens with probability . Thus with probability , . Conditioned on being positive, we saw in an earlier problem that if you're playing from budget to either or zero, then the expected number of games is , so the expected number of games in the th batch is . Therefore which is growing as a function of . So clearly the series id divergent, and , the expected number of games until you are ruined is infinite.
Is your head spinning yet?
As a final word, the doubling trick I've used here is probably not the simplest way to tackle the particular problems in this note. It is, however, a powerful tool, which is more generally applicable in other problems in theoretical computer science, some of which I hope to write about soon.
To be continued.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
There are no comments in this discussion.