Okay, this is something I've noticed. The number of trailing zeroes in
is .
is .
is .
is .
is .
is .
Is there, like, a generalisation or a proof or something for this? And is this result, or observation, useful? Comment any of your thoughts you believe add to this.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Well, I can give you this formula 10n!⇒k=1∑∞⌊5k10n⌋
And the pattern only continues until n is 5, beyond that, there will still be a long chain of 9's but it is not exactly as what you put here. For example, for n=200, number of trailing 0's is 24999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999959
Log in to reply
Oh
I can't spot a pattern in how close it is to what you conjectured (it always seems to be quite close though) but I found a reason why the number of trailing zeroes will tend to be very close to 10^n/4.
Clearly, the number of trailing zeroes is simply the exponent of the 5's in the prime factorization of (10^n)!. If we go by from 1 to 10^n in the expansion of (10^n)! (1234...10^n) and write down the exponent of the greatest power of 5 that divides each number, we notice that 4 in every 25 numbers in the series has a 1, 4 in every 125 has a two, and so on. This allows us to make the following approximation for the exponent of the 5's:
4/25 * 10^n +2 * 4/125 * 10^n... = 4 * 10^n * [1/25+2/125+3/625...]
We can evaluate [1/25+2/125+3/625...] pretty easily:
5S= [1/5+1/25...] + [1/25+1/125...]+...
5S=1/4 + 1/20 + 1/100...
S=1/16
Which shows that we'll get about 10^n/4 trailing zeroes. As n becomes larger, the first few terms will become more accurate (percentage wise) because the error is within a certain range. I'll give an example:
So for a large n, the result of the approximation becomes more accurate. Your observation was mostly true :)
Perhaps we should notice that they are to do with 5. From 10/ 5 = 2, 1000/ 5 = 200, 10000/ 5 = 2000 and 100000/ 5 = 20000, the rough idea is there.