In the question Too complex shared by Avineil Jain, he displayed the identity
\[ \sin 5 \theta = 5 \sin \theta ( 1 - \frac{ \sin ^2 \theta } { \sin ^ 2 p_1 } ) ( 1 - \frac { \sin ^ 2 \theta } { \sin ^ 2 p_2 } ) \]
for some constants and in the range .
I was intrigued by this identity, and did a bit of further investigating. I believe that for all , we have the identity
Can you figure out what this identity is?
Can you prove it?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Proof : First, consider the following Lemma,
Proof : Note that,
k=1∏2nsin(2n+1kπ)=k=1∏nsin(2n+1kπ)⋅k=n+1∏2nsin(2n+1kπ)
=k=1∏nsin(2n+1kπ)⋅k=1∏nsin(2n+1(n+k)π)
=k=1∏nsin(2n+1kπ)⋅k=1∏nsin(2n+1kπ) (∵k=1∏nf(k)=k=1∏nf(n+1−k))
=k=1∏nsin2(2n+1kπ)
But,
k=1∏2nsin(2n+1kπ)=22n2n+1 (For my proof of this, see here )
⟹k=1∏nsin2(2n+1kπ)=22n2n+1
Now, let P=(2n+1)sin(θ)k=1∏n(1−sin2(2n+1kπ)sin2(θ))
=(2n+1)sin(θ)k=1∏nsin2(2n+1kπ)k=1∏n(sin2(2n+1kπ)−sin2(θ))
=22nsin(θ)k=1∏n(cos2(θ)−cos2(2n+1kπ)) (Using the Lemma)
=22nsin(θ)(k=1∏n(cos(θ)+cos(2n+1kπ)))⋅(k=1∏n(cos(θ)−cos(2n+1kπ)))
=22nsin(θ)(k=1∏n(cos(θ)−cos(2n+1(2n+1−k)π)))⋅(k=1∏n(cos(θ)−cos(2n+1kπ))) (∵cos(π−x)=−cosx)
=22nsin(θ)(k=1∏n(cos(θ)−cos(2n+1(n+k)π)))⋅(k=1∏n(cos(θ)−cos(2n+1kπ))) (∵k=1∏nf(k)=k=1∏nf(n+1−k))
=22nsin(θ)(k=n+1∏2n(cos(θ)−cos(2n+1kπ)))⋅(k=1∏n(cos(θ)−cos(2n+1kπ)))
=22nsin(θ)k=1∏2n(cos(θ)−cos(2n+1kπ))
Also,
Un(x)=2nk=1∏n(x−cos(n+1kπ))
where Un(x) denotes the Chebyshev Polynomial of the Second kind.
⟹P=22nsin(θ)⋅2−2n⋅U2n(cosθ)
=sin((2n+1)θ) (∵Un(cosθ)=sinθsin((n+1)θ))
Bonus : We can also use this identity to prove Euler's infinite product for xsinx
In the above proposition, set (2n+1)θ=x such that x is a constant.
⟹sinx=(2n+1)sin(2n+1x)k=1∏n(1−sin2(2n+1kπ)sin2(2n+1x))
Taking n→∞lim and noting that x is a constant, we get,
xsinx=k=1∏∞(1−(kπ)2x2)
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin If we consider the square of Un(x) instead of U2n(x), we'll get another identity, i.e,
sin2(nθ)=n2sin2(θ)k=1∏n−1(1−sin2nkπsin2θ)
But, if we try to prove Euler's infinite product of xsinx, we are getting an incorrect result. Can you kindly help? Also, do you have another way to prove the identity? If so, can you please share that?
@Ishan Singh Can you give me a link from where you got that product resulting in the Chebyshev Polynomial ? I can't find it anywhere on any of the wikis. Please tell me if there exist such product for other kind.
Log in to reply
{cos(n+1kπ)}k=1n are the roots of Un(x) and since we can write any polynomial as its leading coefficient times ∏ (x−roots), hence the factorization. As for the leading coefficient of Un(x) and the fact that its roots are {cos(n+1kπ)}k=1n, you can prove it via induction.
Log in to reply
cos(n+1kπ) are the roots of Un(x). Of course, we can prove by induction but where will one get the statement.
Yeah, I know about the Weirestrass and all but I was just asking how to guess. I mean the first step - how can one guess thatSo, the only way is to look, prove and remember. And I am asking where to look?
BTW, I am sorry to bother you. I will try to look it up somewhere on internet. Thanks!
Log in to reply
Un(x) do you use? If you go by the basic definition, i.e, Un(x)=sin(nsin−1(x)) or another one i.e, Un(cosθ)=sinθsin((n+1)θ) then, it is immediately obvious that the roots of Un(x) are cos(n+1kπ) you don't even need induction. As for the link, I used this to study about some basic properties of chebyshev polynomials. Rest I derived myself.
Can you tell me which definition ofLog in to reply
ri, it's actually that one needs to know the result at hand.
It's not about how to prove that the roots are such. It is all about how you would guess the function known the roots? Okay I would like to find a Weirestrass definition with rootsBTW, I will contradict myself on that as I also believe that that is the whole aim of mathematics - guessing the statement from the result. And, it is all observation about how to make the function outta roots.
Log in to reply
x=cos(n+1kπ) the polynomial is zero, so P(cosθ) should have roots at θ=n+1kπ. Then, if you're familiar with trigonometric equations, you will realize that P(cosθ)=sinθsin((n+1)θ). Further, expand sin((n+1)θ) using Euler's identity and prove every other property of chebyshev polynomial of the second kind, without induction or 'guessing' any result. Similarly for the first kind.
Oh, so you meant how to find the polynomial when roots are given. That's also quite easy. First you see that atAlso, I differ from the statement that the aim of mathematics is guessing the statement from the result and just observations. It's about deductive reasoning, exploring and discovering results and identities from basic theorems. It's not about using maths as a tool or some bag of tricks that you use in a situation, but doesn't work in some other situation. Every branch in maths is interlinked and interdependent. It's all about the mathematical spirit.
An elegant proof involves substitution of θ
Substituting θ=2n+1mπ we find that sin(2n+1)θ=0
This means that sin2pisin2θ=1.
Logic naturally dictates that m must be all the positive integers upto 2n+1
Since θ is for the range (0,2π] , m must be upto n
Thus, pi=2n+1mπ for all m such that 0<m≤n
As far as the constant multiplied to the expression is concerned, there is another neat trick involved -
Let the constant be a .
Substitute θ=4n+2π.
The expression now turns into -
a=(−1)n m=1∏ntan22n+1mπ which is a standard identity for tangent.
Thus, a=(−1)n 2n+1
The only Problem I am facing is that there is a (−1)n popping up in the solution.
@Calvin Lin , Your Thoughts about it ?
Log in to reply
1) Good way to justify what the values of p must be, assuming that the functional form is correct.
2) I do not understand how substituting in θ=4n+2π leads to the result. Can you explain in more detail?
3) I am quite certain that there is no (−1)n. For example, with n=1, we have
sin3θ=3sinθ−4sin3θ=3sinθ(1−43sin2θ)=3sinθ(1−sin23πsin2θ)
4) After finding the possible functional form, you still have to prove that it is correct.
Log in to reply
Ya, I actually made a mistake. We have to substitute θ=2π . That actually takes care of (−1)n.
Substituting θ=4n+2π is a mistake. My bad. And I still have to think of a good way to actually prove
that this form is correct.
@Avineil Jain Thoughts?