This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
We don't have to use cyclic properties.We extend the line AY to meet BC at K.We apply Menelaus theorem for △BCX where AK is the transverse.So we get AXBA×YCXY×KBKC=−1.Since BA is twice of AX and XY=YC.We get KBKC=21.We don't have care about the minus sign as it only to show A does not lie between BX.Next we apply Ceva's theorem for △ABC.We get BXAX×KCBK×AZZC=1.We know that AX=BX and BK=2KC.So we get AZZC=21.Therefore,AZ=2ZC.Hence proved.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
We don't have to use cyclic properties.We extend the line AY to meet BC at K.We apply Menelaus theorem for △BCX where AK is the transverse.So we get AXBA×YCXY×KBKC=−1.Since BA is twice of AX and XY=YC.We get KBKC=21.We don't have care about the minus sign as it only to show A does not lie between BX.Next we apply Ceva's theorem for △ABC.We get BXAX×KCBK×AZZC=1.We know that AX=BX and BK=2KC.So we get AZZC=21.Therefore,AZ=2ZC.Hence proved.
Log in to reply
Why go for Menelaus when Thales' can do ?
Proof:
Note that ar(AXY)=ar(BXY)=ar(BYC)=ar(AYC)=4ar(ABC)
Since, median divides a triangle into 2 parts of equal areas.
Next, put AZ=x and ZC=y
Now,
\frac {x}{x+y} * ar (ABC) = ar(ABZ) \(\implies \frac {x}{x+y}* ar (ABC) = \frac{ar (ABC)}{2} + ar (CYA)
⟹x+yx∗ar(ABC)=2ar(ABC+x+yx∗4ar(ABC)
⟹x+yx[ar(ABC)−ar(CYA)]=ar(ABC)∗21
⟹x+yx[43∗ar(CYAB)=2ar(ABC)
⟹x+yx∗[43∗ar(ABC)
⟹x+yx=32
⟹x=2y
Hence, proved.
Log in to reply
Its not z, its x, unable to edit.
And forgive me for the brackets not being closed and other mistakes that I am unable to edit.
Log in to reply
I was unable to solve it using my limited knowledge of cyclic quads.
There is no 3/4 in 4th last line.
Log in to reply
This question can easily be solved using midpoint theorem and similarity rules as above.
Seriously, BC cut AC at Z; wont that make Z coincide with C and consequently CZ will be 0.
Log in to reply
sorry my bad .i corrected it plss try to solve it and give mme the solution i will be gratefull
Log in to reply
you can use the cevas theorem and the menuluas theorem to prove this
and can use properties of cyclic quadrilaterals beacause my teacher said that it can be solve by using the properties of cyclic quadrilaterals