ABCABCABC any triangle
Any BDBDBD and CECECE drawn such that DDD lies on ACACAC and EEE lies on ABABAB
DEDEDE drawn
BDBDBD and CECECE intersect at III
AO=OIAO=OIAO=OI
EN=NDEN=NDEN=ND
BM=MCBM=MCBM=MC
Prove that M−N−OM-N-OM−N−O are collinear
Note by Megh Parikh 7 years, 9 months ago
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
_italics_
**bold**
__bold__
- bulleted- list
1. numbered2. list
paragraph 1paragraph 2
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
This is a quote
# I indented these lines # 4 spaces, and now they show # up as a code block. print "hello world"
\(
\)
\[
\]
2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
We will use normalized barycentric coordinates A=(1,0,0)A = (1,0,0)A=(1,0,0), B=(0,1,0)B = (0,1,0)B=(0,1,0), C=(0,0,1)C = (0,0,1)C=(0,0,1). Then D=(p,0,1−p)D = (p,0,1 - p)D=(p,0,1−p), E=(q,1−q,0)E = (q,1 - q,0)E=(q,1−q,0). Now NNN is a midpoint of DEDEDE, hence N=(p+q2,1−q2,1−p2)N = \left(\frac{p + q}{2}, \frac{1 - q}{2},\frac{1 - p}{2}\right)N=(2p+q,21−q,21−p) Equation of line BDBDBD is pz=(1−p)xpz = (1 - p)xpz=(1−p)x and equation of line CECECE is (1−q)x=qy(1 - q)x = qy(1−q)x=qy Intersecting these lines we get I=(pqp+q−pq,p(1−q)p+q−pq,q(1−p)p+q−pq)I = \left(\frac{pq}{p + q - pq}, \frac{p(1 - q)}{p + q - pq}, \frac{q(1 - p)}{p + q - pq}\right)I=(p+q−pqpq,p+q−pqp(1−q),p+q−pqq(1−p)) Now OOO is midpoint of AIAIAI, hence O=(p+q2(p+q−pq),p(1−q)2(p+q−pq),q(1−p)2(p+q−pq))O = \left(\frac{p + q}{2(p + q - pq)}, \frac{p(1 - q)}{2(p + q - pq)}, \frac{q(1 - p)}{2(p + q - pq)}\right)O=(2(p+q−pq)p+q,2(p+q−pq)p(1−q),2(p+q−pq)q(1−p)) And MMM is midpoint of BCBCBC, so trivially M=(0,12,12)M = \left(0, \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}\right)M=(0,21,21) Now note that ∣p+q21−q21−p2p+q2(p+q−pq)p(1−q)2(p+q−pq)q(1−p)2(p+q−pq)01/21/2∣=0\begin{vmatrix} \frac{p + q}{2}& \frac{1 - q}{2}&\frac{1 - p}{2} \\ \frac{p + q}{2(p + q - pq)}& \frac{p(1 - q)}{2(p + q - pq)}& \frac{q(1 - p)}{2(p + q - pq)} \\ 0& 1/2& 1/2 \end{vmatrix} = 0∣∣∣∣∣∣2p+q2(p+q−pq)p+q021−q2(p+q−pq)p(1−q)1/221−p2(p+q−pq)q(1−p)1/2∣∣∣∣∣∣=0 Hence M,N,OM,N,OM,N,O are collinear.
Log in to reply
I'm not sure I understand your last step. Are you taking the determinant of a matrix? I'm assuming that's what you're doing. How does that tell you that the three points are co-linear?
The main idea is: If the area of a triangle is 0, then the vertices lie on a straight line.
Note that once you found the coordinates of the points, you could go about finding the line that these three points are on. However, unless the ratios are immediate, this often requires a bunch more algebra. Showing that the area is 0 could be more straightforward.
Barycentric coordinates merely make the algebra much easier / nicer. A coordinate geometry approach would work similarly, though with much uglier values.
See here http://zacharyabel.com/papers/Barycentric_A07.pdf page 5.
This is the Newton-Gauss line of a complete quadrilateral.
Why did every comment gets vote down?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
We will use normalized barycentric coordinates A=(1,0,0), B=(0,1,0), C=(0,0,1). Then D=(p,0,1−p), E=(q,1−q,0). Now N is a midpoint of DE, hence N=(2p+q,21−q,21−p) Equation of line BD is pz=(1−p)x and equation of line CE is (1−q)x=qy Intersecting these lines we get I=(p+q−pqpq,p+q−pqp(1−q),p+q−pqq(1−p)) Now O is midpoint of AI, hence O=(2(p+q−pq)p+q,2(p+q−pq)p(1−q),2(p+q−pq)q(1−p)) And M is midpoint of BC, so trivially M=(0,21,21) Now note that ∣∣∣∣∣∣2p+q2(p+q−pq)p+q021−q2(p+q−pq)p(1−q)1/221−p2(p+q−pq)q(1−p)1/2∣∣∣∣∣∣=0 Hence M,N,O are collinear.
Log in to reply
I'm not sure I understand your last step. Are you taking the determinant of a matrix? I'm assuming that's what you're doing. How does that tell you that the three points are co-linear?
Log in to reply
The main idea is: If the area of a triangle is 0, then the vertices lie on a straight line.
Note that once you found the coordinates of the points, you could go about finding the line that these three points are on. However, unless the ratios are immediate, this often requires a bunch more algebra. Showing that the area is 0 could be more straightforward.
Barycentric coordinates merely make the algebra much easier / nicer. A coordinate geometry approach would work similarly, though with much uglier values.
See here http://zacharyabel.com/papers/Barycentric_A07.pdf page 5.
This is the Newton-Gauss line of a complete quadrilateral.
Why did every comment gets vote down?