This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Here's my solution:
Without loss of generality, assume that ∣b∣≤∣c∣≤∣a∣. Then by Cauchy−Schwarz Inequaility we have
(a+b+c−k2abc)2=[a(1−k2bc)+(b+c)]2≤[a2+(b+c)2][(1−k2bc)2+12]=(k+2bc)(2−k4bc+k24b2c2)=2k+k28b3c3−k4b2c2=2k+k24b2c2(2bc−k)
Since ∣b∣≤∣c∣≤∣a∣, a2≥3k, which implies that
2bc≤b2+c2=k−a2≤k−3k≤32k<k
Therefore, 2bc−k<0, which yields (a+b+c−k2abc)2≤2k or
k2abc−2k≤a+b+c≤k2abc+2k
Great solution. Just to state that 2bc≤b2+c2<k since a cannot be zero otherwise all of them are 0, which contradicts the condition k>0, just showing this so we do not need the 3k thing.
Hi, if we substitute k=a2+b2+c2 into the inequalities, then the system of inequalities is homogeneous, let u=a+b+c, v=ab+bc+ca and w=abc, then the system becomes u2−2v2w−2u2−4v≤u≤u2−2v2w+2u2−4v i.e. u2−2v2w−2u2−4v−u≤0≤u2−2v2w+2u2−4v−u Both expressions are linear in w. By uvw method it suffices to prove inequality in two cases 1) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)=0, 2) abc=0, in the first case we let WLOG b=c and we have to prove a2+2b22ab2−2a2+4b2≤a+2b≤a2+2b22ab2+2a2+4b2 which is easy. In the second case WLOG let c=0 and we have to prove −2a2+2b2≤a+b≤2a2+2b2 which is again easy.
Here is link to the method used: PDF I used different substitution, but it doesn't interfere with the method.
Clearly the leftmost side is less than the rightmost side as k is positive. But beyond that, I'll have to do more than a first time glance to get this!
for 3 real numbers a,b and c, notice that AM=(a+b+c)/3, GM=(abc)^(1/3) and RMS=sqrt[(a^2+b^2+c^2)/3].
try to use RMS>AM>GM.i tried and it worked.but the solution is around 20-22 lines long.so will take a long time to type :-(
Wow that is so long. You did it great. But I think for this problem, AM−GM has nothing to do here. Like what David say, AM−GM only works on positive number. Let say for your case a=1,b=−1 and c=0 then AM=0<GM=32.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Here's my solution:
Without loss of generality, assume that ∣b∣≤∣c∣≤∣a∣. Then by Cauchy−Schwarz Inequaility we have
(a+b+c−k2abc)2=[a(1−k2bc)+(b+c)]2≤[a2+(b+c)2][(1−k2bc)2+12]=(k+2bc)(2−k4bc+k24b2c2)=2k+k28b3c3−k4b2c2=2k+k24b2c2(2bc−k) Since ∣b∣≤∣c∣≤∣a∣, a2≥3k, which implies that 2bc≤b2+c2=k−a2≤k−3k≤32k<k Therefore, 2bc−k<0, which yields (a+b+c−k2abc)2≤2k or k2abc−2k≤a+b+c≤k2abc+2k
Log in to reply
Great solution. Just to state that 2bc≤b2+c2<k since a cannot be zero otherwise all of them are 0, which contradicts the condition k>0, just showing this so we do not need the 3k thing.
Good solution. Your main observation is that the inequality is equivalent to showing that [(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2)−2abc]2≤2(a2+b2+c2)3.
This could also be done through brute force expansion and then AM-GM several times (i.e. Muirhead).
Hands down, your solution answered it all. Thanks :)
Hi, if we substitute k=a2+b2+c2 into the inequalities, then the system of inequalities is homogeneous, let u=a+b+c, v=ab+bc+ca and w=abc, then the system becomes u2−2v2w−2u2−4v≤u≤u2−2v2w+2u2−4v i.e. u2−2v2w−2u2−4v−u≤0≤u2−2v2w+2u2−4v−u Both expressions are linear in w. By uvw method it suffices to prove inequality in two cases 1) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)=0, 2) abc=0, in the first case we let WLOG b=c and we have to prove a2+2b22ab2−2a2+4b2≤a+2b≤a2+2b22ab2+2a2+4b2 which is easy. In the second case WLOG let c=0 and we have to prove −2a2+2b2≤a+b≤2a2+2b2 which is again easy.
Here is link to the method used: PDF I used different substitution, but it doesn't interfere with the method.
Log in to reply
It took me a bit longer to understand, but I got it. Thanks :)
Clearly the leftmost side is less than the rightmost side as k is positive. But beyond that, I'll have to do more than a first time glance to get this!
Log in to reply
Yes, and to be honest I don't have any clue to solve this inequality.
Any chance you could tell us where you got this problem?
Log in to reply
Oh sorry, my friend gave me this problem. Unfortunately she didn't mention where she get this problem from.
Log in to reply
That's fine, thanks. :)
for 3 real numbers a,b and c, notice that AM=(a+b+c)/3, GM=(abc)^(1/3) and RMS=sqrt[(a^2+b^2+c^2)/3]. try to use RMS>AM>GM.i tried and it worked.but the solution is around 20-22 lines long.so will take a long time to type :-(
Log in to reply
How do you account for the fact that a,b, and/or c could be negative numbers too. I thought AM-GM only works for positive numbers.
Wow that is so long. You did it great. But I think for this problem, AM−GM has nothing to do here. Like what David say, AM−GM only works on positive number. Let say for your case a=1,b=−1 and c=0 then AM=0<GM=32.
Put the value of k in both sides, square up, rearrange & you will get it after some reasoning...
Log in to reply
What do you mean by put the value of k in both sides? Since there are three sides on the ineq.
easy
Log in to reply
Would you like to show your solution or maybe some hints?