The following are examples of transforming hard problems into simpler problems.
Problem 1: If and are integers with , how many integers satisfy ?
The possible integers are . But how many are there? To solve this, we consider the following simpler problem.
Problem 2: If is an integer greater than 1, how many integers satisfy ?
The set of integers satisfying is , so there are such integers.
Now, to go from Problem 1 to Problem 2, we use the change of variables . Then
By Problem 2, there are possible values for , hence there are possible values for .
We now show how to transform questions over the rationals to questions over the integers.
Problem 3: If and are rational numbers that are not squares of other rational numbers, show that is not rational.
This may seem difficult to approach. Instead, consider the following simpler problem:
Problem 4: If and are integers that are not squares of other integers, show that is not an integer.
We can further simplify the problem:
Problem 5: If is an integer that is not the square of another integer, show that is not an integer.
Now, this is a straightforward problem. The proof of Problem 5 is by contradiction: If is equal to integer , then , implying is the square of an integer, a contradiction.
Now, consider a generalized version of Problem 5.
Generalized Problem 5. If is a rational number that is not the square of another rational number, show that is not a rational number.
Proof of Generalized Problem 5: If , then , implying is the square of rational number .
We then obtain the following corollary.
Corollary: If is an integer such that is rational, then must be the square of an integer.
Proof: From Problem 5, is the square of a rational number with . Hence . Since is an integer, we have , implying .
Now, back to Problem 4.
Proof of Problem 4:
Suppose is an integer. Consider . Squaring both sides, we obtain , implying is rational. By the corollary above, must be a square. Similarly, must be an square, a contradiction.
Finally, we prove Problem 3.
Proof of Problem 3:
Suppose and satisfy , where are all integers. Then
This is a contradiction to Problem 4.
Corollary: If and are rational numbers such that is rational, then and are both rational.
The slightly surprising result is that in simplifying Problem 3 to Problem 4, we ended up using Problem 4 to prove Problem 3. In fact, as is often the case with rational numbers, it is sufficient to consider the integer case and then clear denominators by multiplication.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
There are no comments in this discussion.