This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
[Note: Harshit had a previous comment, which I was replying to and quoting from. This will make more sense had his comment not been deleted.]
The additional restriction is that g(x) must be a polynomial with integer coefficients, as you can see from my previous comment.
I don't see why 5x2+10x+5 will be considered a perfect square, even though we can write 5x2+10x+5=(5x+5)2. The coefficients are not integers. If you consider 5x2+10x+5 is a perfect square, then it would suggest that for x=0, you will consider that 5 is a perfect square. If this is the case, then the discussion is moot because you are working with very different definitions from everyone else.
You cannot say that you "took into account a square root complex coefficients as well, since its very rare to find perfect squares". In this case, you are no longer finding perfect squares, but a 'perfect Harshit square'. By changing the definitions of the question, you are no longer answering it properly. You also added irrational coefficients, hence, every non-negative real number is now a 'perfect Harshit square' since a=a2. Adding complex coefficients means that every single complex number is now a 'perfect Harshit square'.
What is the definition of perfect square for polynomials?
If we look at the definition of perfect square for integers, even though 5=52 and −1=i2, we do not say that 5 or -1 is a perfect square. Instead, we require N=k2 is a perfect square if k is an integer.
In keeping with the ideas expressed in a perfect square of an integer, if we have f(x)=g(x)2, we require g(x) to be a polynomial with integer coefficients. For example, 5=52 or −x2=(ix)2 should not be considered a perfect square. [Though it seems from your example of p(x) that you will be willing to consider them as perfect squares.] Also x3=(x23)2 will not be considered a perfect square, since the g(x) is not a polynomial.
(Note: Some people consider it valid if the polynomial has rational coefficients, as opposed to integer coefficient. This depends on the context given. Most certainly, if the coefficients are irrational or imaginary, then it will not be a perfect square)
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
[Note: Harshit had a previous comment, which I was replying to and quoting from. This will make more sense had his comment not been deleted.]
The additional restriction is that g(x) must be a polynomial with integer coefficients, as you can see from my previous comment.
I don't see why 5x2+10x+5 will be considered a perfect square, even though we can write 5x2+10x+5=(5x+5)2. The coefficients are not integers. If you consider 5x2+10x+5 is a perfect square, then it would suggest that for x=0, you will consider that 5 is a perfect square. If this is the case, then the discussion is moot because you are working with very different definitions from everyone else.
You cannot say that you "took into account a square root complex coefficients as well, since its very rare to find perfect squares". In this case, you are no longer finding perfect squares, but a 'perfect Harshit square'. By changing the definitions of the question, you are no longer answering it properly. You also added irrational coefficients, hence, every non-negative real number is now a 'perfect Harshit square' since a=a2. Adding complex coefficients means that every single complex number is now a 'perfect Harshit square'.
[Note: This is not a previous Brilliant problem.]
What is the definition of perfect square for polynomials?
If we look at the definition of perfect square for integers, even though 5=52 and −1=i2, we do not say that 5 or -1 is a perfect square. Instead, we require N=k2 is a perfect square if k is an integer.
In keeping with the ideas expressed in a perfect square of an integer, if we have f(x)=g(x)2, we require g(x) to be a polynomial with integer coefficients. For example, 5=52 or −x2=(ix)2 should not be considered a perfect square. [Though it seems from your example of p(x) that you will be willing to consider them as perfect squares.] Also x3=(x23)2 will not be considered a perfect square, since the g(x) is not a polynomial.
(Note: Some people consider it valid if the polynomial has rational coefficients, as opposed to integer coefficient. This depends on the context given. Most certainly, if the coefficients are irrational or imaginary, then it will not be a perfect square)