msinx+∫0x(sect)m dt>(m+1)x \large m \sin x + \int_0^x (\sec t)^m \, dt > (m+1) x msinx+∫0x(sect)mdt>(m+1)x
For all 0<x<π20 <x<\dfrac\pi20<x<2π, and m∈Nm \in \mathbb Nm∈N, the inequality above holds true.
Prove the inequality above without differentiating it.
Note by Rishabh Deep Singh 5 years, 2 months ago
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
_italics_
**bold**
__bold__
- bulleted- list
1. numbered2. list
paragraph 1paragraph 2
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
This is a quote
# I indented these lines # 4 spaces, and now they show # up as a code block. print "hello world"
\(
\)
\[
\]
2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Cool question! Only an outline, sorry, because I'm stretched for time.
Write (sect)m (\sec t)^m (sect)m as (1+tan2t)m2 (1 + \tan^2 t)^{\frac{m}{2}} (1+tan2t)2m.
Then use Bernoulli's inequality, (1+x)n>1+nx (1 + x)^n > 1 + nx (1+x)n>1+nx for x=tan2t,n=m2 x = \tan^2 t, n = \frac{m}{2} x=tan2t,n=2m.
Integrate the terms (not difficult), and then you'll get, this is equivalent to, 2sinx+tanx>3x 2 \sin x + \tan x > 3x 2sinx+tanx>3x which is true (if you see the Maclaurin series expansions).
EDIT: Screw Maclaurin series, I found this absolute beauty of a gem to prove 2sinx+tanx>3x 2 \sin x + \tan x > 3x 2sinx+tanx>3x.
2sinx+tanx=∫0x(2cost+sec2t)dt=∫0x(cost+cost+1cos2t)dt>∫0x3dt=3x 2 \sin x + \tan x = \int\limits_{0}^{x} (2\cos t + \sec^2 t) dt = \int\limits_{0}^{x} \left(\cos t + \cos t + \dfrac{1}{\cos^2 t}\right) dt > \int\limits_{0}^{x} 3 dt = 3x 2sinx+tanx=0∫x(2cost+sec2t)dt=0∫x(cost+cost+cos2t1)dt>0∫x3dt=3x where the inequality follows by AM-GM!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Cool question!
Only an outline, sorry, because I'm stretched for time.
Write (sect)m as (1+tan2t)2m.
Then use Bernoulli's inequality, (1+x)n>1+nx for x=tan2t,n=2m.
Integrate the terms (not difficult), and then you'll get, this is equivalent to, 2sinx+tanx>3x which is true (if you see the Maclaurin series expansions).
EDIT: Screw Maclaurin series, I found this absolute beauty of a gem to prove 2sinx+tanx>3x.
2sinx+tanx=0∫x(2cost+sec2t)dt=0∫x(cost+cost+cos2t1)dt>0∫x3dt=3x
where the inequality follows by AM-GM!