Help ... Geometry! My Bad!

I had recently opened a discussion thread about a geometry problem from an online-math-camp-test after the test was over. However, it turns out I broke some rule. There was a 24-hour rule ("no problems are to be discussed until 24 hours have passed") and I somehow missed that rule. Now that 24 hours have passed, it's completely okay to discuss about that problem.

I've deleted the previous discussion thread and I'm really sorry for the inconvenience.

Here's the problem I was talking about:

In XYZ△XYZ,

2X=3Y2∠X=3∠Y and YZ=xYZ=x, XZ=yXZ=y, XY=zXY=z. Find a triangle that has positive integer side lengths and satisfies the equation:

(x2y2)(x2+zxy2)=y2z2(x^2-y^2)(x^2+zx-y^2)=y^2z^2

Good luck and thanks in advance!

Problem source: RGS Math Olympiad-June 2013.

This problem was also recycled in BdMO online math camp exam-1.

#Geometry #OlympiadMath #MathProblem

Note by Mursalin Habib
7 years, 9 months ago

No vote yet
6 votes

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Well, I worked on this problem a bit.

Let X=3θ \angle X = 3\theta & Y=2θ\angle Y = 2\theta. Then Z=π5θ\angle Z = \pi - 5\theta. Applying sine rule, we get:

xsin3θ=ysin2θ=zsin5θ=k \frac{x}{\sin{3\theta}} = \frac{y}{\sin{2\theta}} = \frac{z}{\sin{5\theta}} = k (Say)

Putting in the given equation, it is observed that the equation turns out to be an identity for such a kk & θ\theta.

As such you want to find a real kk such that ksin2θ,ksin3θk \sin{2\theta}, k \sin{3\theta} & ksin5θk \sin{5\theta} are all integers, which apparently doesn't seem possible (by noting cases when sine function has 'good looking' rational & irrational values).

A Brilliant Member - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for the help. Notice that the angles don't have to be integers. So, trying to find cases when sine function has 'good looking' rational & irrational values obviously won't work. I tried using the cosine law like Timmy but the equation gets really messy. So I gave up.

Mursalin Habib - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

I admit that angles don't need to be integers,but a conclusion can be made:

If the sines have ugly values,obviously no kk will work for all 3 of them (by inspection), so we limit ourselves to rationals & those irrationals (for which we can easily define a conjugate, in the prospect of multiplying it to kk to receive an integral value). Trial shows no such rational values exist (sine function has many less rational values, had it been tan function,it would have been less difficult!) & trying to find such irrational values which have similar conjugates for such θ\theta so that all angles are less than 180180^{\circ} also doesn't come up.

A Brilliant Member - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Brilliant Member

Trial shows no such rational values exist

Could you explain a bit more? What kind of trial?

sine function has many less rational values

I thought the sine function could take any rational value in the range [1,1][-1, 1] [in this case, (0,1](0, 1]].

Am I saying something wrong?

Do you mean to say this problem has no solution? I know for a fact that it does. (x,y,z)=(144,135,31)(x,y,z)=(144,135,31) is the solution [credit goes to John H. See the previous deleted discussion].

Mursalin Habib - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mursalin Habib Oh, I guess θ=6.106...\theta = 6.106... suffices.(as per the assumption,I haven't checked yet). Clearly a very ugly rational(or maybe irrational) sine value :). Please link me to his solution.

A Brilliant Member - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Brilliant Member If I had a complete solution, we wouldn't be having this discussion, would we?

Jon H.'s comment contained the numerical answer only. He didn't post a fully worked solution.

Mursalin Habib - 7 years, 9 months ago

Silly rule…

Tim Vermeulen - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Silly or not, I want to respect the rules and do everything by the book.

Now would anyone like to help me? An approach? A cryptic hint maybe?

Mursalin Habib - 7 years, 9 months ago

Here's a starter. Currently I have not been able to complete the solution, but I will (probably) post it soon. I am not sure if this is the most elegant way to do this though: it is certainly very tedious.

Let X=3θX= 3 \theta and Y=2θY= 2 \theta . From the cosine rule, x2=y2+z22yzcos3θx^2= y^2 + z^2 - 2yz \cos3\theta . Then, x2y2=z(z2ycos3θ)x^2-y^2= z(z - 2y \cos3\theta) . Also note that x2y2+zx=z(z+x2ycos3θ)x^2-y^2+zx= z(z+x-2y \cos3\theta) . We can now substitute these values in the given equation:

z2(z2ycos3θ)(z+x2ycos3θ)=y2z2 z^2 (z - 2y \cos3\theta)(z+x-2y \cos3\theta)= y^2z^2     (z2ycos3θ)(z+x2ycos3θ)=y2\implies (z - 2y \cos 3\theta)(z+x-2y \cos3\theta)= y^2     (z2ycos3θ)(z+x2ycos3θ)=z2+x22xzcos2θ\implies (z - 2y \cos 3\theta)(z+x-2y \cos 3\theta)= z^2 + x^2 - 2xz\cos 2\theta If you expand the L.H.S, the z2z^2 term cancels out. The equation, still, will be a gigantic one.

Sreejato Bhattacharya - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks a lot!

This is the way I approached the problem. But I gave up when I saw the ugly-looking equation. It looks like you're onto something. So post your solution solution when you're done. This problem has been nagging me for 3 months. It's time to put it to rest.

Once again, thank you so much!

Mursalin Habib - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

The only reason I think it might work is that it helps for the cancellation of y2y^2. I expanded the L.H.S, and as expected, the z2z^2 term also cancels out. But what remains is a mammoth equation, which is very difficult to interpret. So I'd say let's not expand the brackets, and make a few more trigonometric substitutions to see what we get. What I have got so far is not even close to a concrete solution.

Sreejato Bhattacharya - 7 years, 9 months ago

I try to use cosine rule to solve it, but the equation goes complicated...

Timmy Ben - 7 years, 9 months ago

I'm not sure if this would work: first solve the equation as a diophantine equation. there may be infinity number of solutions or only one may be. Narrow down the possible solutions by triangle inequality. Then check out for which of those solutions, 2X=3Y is true. [ i really am not good at math, so sorry if it is another silly method ]. By the way, I live in NAM garden, near to you.

Aiman Rafeed - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

How do you know where I live? Dhaka is a big place. And you can't see my address by viewing my profile (that is only for the staff to see).

Have you been spying on me?:)

Mursalin Habib - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

I'm not spying on you. I first came to know about you and the fact that your college is Notre Dame from Brilliant. One day Tushar(you know him) was talking something about a boy named Mursalin who studies in Notre Dame at our English coaching. So I thought it might have been the same Mursalin from Brilliant and so I asked some things about you out of 'just' curiosity (not for spying) and came to know.... btw, was my suggestion able to help you out? Even a bit? Really sorry to waste your time if it didn't.

Aiman Rafeed - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Aiman Rafeed I was joking you know [notice the smiley at the end of my comment].

Why are you being so apologetic? You did nothing wrong. Cheer up!

Mursalin Habib - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mursalin Habib I seriously didn't notice the smiley...ha ha. Anyway, let me know as soon as you solve it. And if you can, post the solution here in brief.

Aiman Rafeed - 7 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Aiman Rafeed Will do (if I manage to solve it).

Mursalin Habib - 7 years, 9 months ago

Silly person...

Justin Wong - 7 years, 9 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...