Once again, I'm coming to Brilliant with another question. This time, it's on the limits of probabilities.
I was investigating this problem:
You are playing a computer game with of your friends (a total of people), and each of you get a chest with a chance of giving you a prize. What is the probability that none of you get a prize?
I realized that each party member has a chance of not getting a prize. This approaches 100% as you have more and more party members. The party probability is easy to find once you find the individual probability. Since the probability for each party member is , you just need to raise it to the power, since there are people in the party.
Then, I got curious about the infinite limit of the function: After I graphed it, I realized that there is a horizontal asymptote, and it cannot be calculated through traditional methods. Could someone explain how to get the solution (not just through WolframAlpha...)? I know it is approximately through direct observation.
It is actually very interesting that, if there is an arbitrarily large amount of people, the probability that no one will get a prize is more than a third! Talk about bad odds!
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Well, since the probability of a person getting a prize depends on the number of people themselves, the result is not so surprising.
How did you stumble upon this problem?
Log in to reply
Actually, this problem is based off of an actual scenario that I was involved in. I just got curious and decided to generalize it.
Log in to reply
Did you realise that the number you produced is actually e1? You have a real scenario? That is interesting. Can you tell me about it?
Log in to reply
Scenario: I play this mobile game called Clash Royale. They recently added a feature where everyone in your group, called a clan, gets a chest after winning in an event. The winning chest has a 1 in 10 chance of giving you a special prize. Now, my clan has 30 members, so I knew that I should expect 3 people in my clan to get the prize. Then, I started getting curious about the probability of no one getting a prize. You can infer what happened from there: I calculated it, decided to generalize for a clan of n members with a 1 in n chance of getting the prize, and then I got here.
Log in to reply
ex=n→∞lim(1+nx)n
Well, it is an well known fact thatI am not sure I am following. Why does the chance of someone getting a prize in the clan reduce when there are more people?
Log in to reply
x with -1 gives you that same function, which makes the limit equal to e−1. What is the name of this famous limit? I've never seen it.
Ah, I see. ReplacingIn the original scenario, the probability of getting the prize was independent of the number of members in the clan. I modified that scenario, giving us the one mentioned in the note.
Log in to reply
Cool. Maybe you can post this as a problem?
Log in to reply
Here it is! Thanks for the help!