Four married couples, with name A, B, C, D (male) and E, F, G, H (female), meet for a game of chess. They form four groups of two players. The following information is given :
- B plays against E
- A plays against C's wife
- F plays against G's husband
- D plays against A's wife
- G plays against E's husband
The wife of B is ...
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Here is another solution:
Since A plays against C's wife, and D plays against A's wife, then B could only plays against B's or D's wife.
If B plays against his wife, which mean E is B's wife, then G plays against B, which contradict.
That means B plays against D's wife, therefore D is E's husband. And because G plays against D (E's husband) that mean G is A's wife, F plays with A so F is C's wife, then the remaining B's wife is H
Do case by case: Start by showing that A cannot be F's husband.
Log in to reply
How can I show that ?
Log in to reply
Actually you can start from anywhere.
Basically what I'm doing is case by case:
C's wife is either E, F, G, or H.
Case 1: Suppose C's wife is E, then from statement 2, A plays against E. But from statement 1, B also plays against E. Which is a contradiction.
Case 2: Suppose C's wife is F, then from statement 2, A plays against F, And from statement 3, A is G's husband. And from statement 4, D plays against G, This leaves us with C plays against H. And everything checks out.
Case 3: Suppose C's wife is G, then from statement 2, A plays against G. From statement 3, F plays against C. This leaves us with D plays against H. So A's wife is H. But because G plays against A, then A is E's husband. Which is a contradiction.
Can you work out Case 4 yourself?
Log in to reply