This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
I'm not sure about the answer, but I think this will help you.
Let the digits be a85≥a84≥⋯≥a1 such that a1+a2+⋯+a85=a1a2⋯a85, then a1a2⋯a85a1+a1a2⋯a85a2+⋯+a1a2⋯a85a85=1. we have 85 fractions and the greatest of them is the last one, therefore a1a2⋯a85a85≥851 and then a1a2⋯a84≤85.
At most six digits among a1,a2,…,a84 are greater than 1, therefore, at least 78 digits are equal to 1.
Can you please explain the last sentence in your argument? It is not very obvious to me. I think we need to find the integer less than or equal to 85 with highest number of divisors with one digit and I think according to your argument such integer has at most 6 one digit divisors. Right?
Each of a1,a2,…,a84 is a positive integer (zeros are not allowed). Suppose seven digits among a1,a2,…,a84 are greater than 1, i.e. are ≥2, then the product a1a2⋯a84 will be ≥27=128 which is a contradiction. Therefore, at most six digits among a1,a2,…,a84 can be greater than 1, thus, at least 78 of them are equal to 1.
8x3x2x2=96.Since the other numbers are 1s, when they are multiplied by any number, it equals to the number you multiplied it by. 8+3+2+2=15, there are 81 1s that add up to 81.
81+15 =96. I hope this helped!
@Rohan Subagaran
–
I think he means to say ''prove that this is the largest number and there is no other larger number''. I think a simple case by case analysis( of a lot of cases) should suffice.
Let there be less than or equal to 78 '1's then the product of the remaining digits is at least 222..*2 (product of 7 twos) which is 128. But this number(222222211.....1) does not satisfy the given condition. Replacing any '2' which any other digit still won't make the number satisfy the given condition( since the number will just get larger) nor will replacing a '1' by any other digit.( since the product gets larger). We want a smaller product. Hence there should be at least 79 '1's
@A Former Brilliant Member
–
Actually my proof is the same as your proof above mine but you say that at most there are 6 digit not equal to one and so there must be 85 - 6 = 79, at least 79 '1's...
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I'm not sure about the answer, but I think this will help you.
Let the digits be a85≥a84≥⋯≥a1 such that a1+a2+⋯+a85=a1a2⋯a85, then a1a2⋯a85a1+a1a2⋯a85a2+⋯+a1a2⋯a85a85=1. we have 85 fractions and the greatest of them is the last one, therefore a1a2⋯a85a85≥851 and then a1a2⋯a84≤85.
At most six digits among a1,a2,…,a84 are greater than 1, therefore, at least 78 digits are equal to 1.
Log in to reply
Can you please explain the last sentence in your argument? It is not very obvious to me. I think we need to find the integer less than or equal to 85 with highest number of divisors with one digit and I think according to your argument such integer has at most 6 one digit divisors. Right?
Log in to reply
Each of a1,a2,…,a84 is a positive integer (zeros are not allowed). Suppose seven digits among a1,a2,…,a84 are greater than 1, i.e. are ≥2, then the product a1a2⋯a84 will be ≥27=128 which is a contradiction. Therefore, at most six digits among a1,a2,…,a84 can be greater than 1, thus, at least 78 of them are equal to 1.
Log in to reply
8322111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
highest 1 I got............ only 1 I got
8322 with 81 1s at the back
Log in to reply
Could you show us your proof of your answer Rohan?? ^^
Log in to reply
8x3x2x2=96.Since the other numbers are 1s, when they are multiplied by any number, it equals to the number you multiplied it by. 8+3+2+2=15, there are 81 1s that add up to 81. 81+15 =96. I hope this helped!
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
It is pretty easy to see why there must be at least 79 or more '1's in this number. A really interesting problem.
Log in to reply
Could you show us your proof of this fact?
Log in to reply
Let there be less than or equal to 78 '1's then the product of the remaining digits is at least 222..*2 (product of 7 twos) which is 128. But this number(222222211.....1) does not satisfy the given condition. Replacing any '2' which any other digit still won't make the number satisfy the given condition( since the number will just get larger) nor will replacing a '1' by any other digit.( since the product gets larger). We want a smaller product. Hence there should be at least 79 '1's
Log in to reply