This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Firstly, there are 2 possibilities for the motion of the 2 blocks : ∙ The blocks stick to each other (i.e they do not slide on each other). ∙ The blocks slide on each other.
To confirm the possible motion of the blocks, we first assume that the blocks stick to each other. If we encounter a contradiction, we can conclude that the blocks slide on each other.
Using the diagram, let us write down a few known forces on the upper block.
N=2gcos(30o)=3g
Therefore,
fmax=μN=23g
As assumed, the blocks stay together. So, the net acceleration of the 2-block system is clearly,
anet=gsin(30o)=2g
Now, note that the acceleration of the individual blocks is the same as the net acceleration (as they are stuck together).
Using Newton's Second Law on the upper block, we get,
f+2gsin(30o)=2⋅anet=22g=g
f+g=g
⇒f=0
Also, note that this doesn't create any contradiction, as the maximum friction is not surpassed by the friction here. In other words, fmax>f (which must be true always, except that there can also be an equality).
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
alt text
LINK: here
Firstly, there are 2 possibilities for the motion of the 2 blocks :
∙ The blocks stick to each other (i.e they do not slide on each other).
∙ The blocks slide on each other.
To confirm the possible motion of the blocks, we first assume that the blocks stick to each other. If we encounter a contradiction, we can conclude that the blocks slide on each other.
Using the diagram, let us write down a few known forces on the upper block.
N=2gcos(30o)=3g
Therefore,
fmax=μN=23g
As assumed, the blocks stay together. So, the net acceleration of the 2-block system is clearly,
anet=gsin(30o)=2g
Now, note that the acceleration of the individual blocks is the same as the net acceleration (as they are stuck together).
Using Newton's Second Law on the upper block, we get,
f+2gsin(30o)=2⋅anet=22g=g
f+g=g
⇒f=0
Also, note that this doesn't create any contradiction, as the maximum friction is not surpassed by the friction here. In other words,
fmax>f (which must be true always, except that there can also be an equality).
Log in to reply
Thanks! That's the actual answer.
0.866
Log in to reply
Why?
0